Saturday, September 30, 2006

This Baghdad Election Failed, Too!



Ali Baba Goes To Town (1937) is on Fox Movie Channel tomorrow morning, October 1st, at 6 AM EST, and damn it, I'm going to miss taping it. If anyone is so inclined, I would love a copy of the film -- it was one of Marge's and my faves from this year's Cinefest (see my Myrant post on the film
  • right ch'ere, on our stage).
  • It also featured a joke concerning Vermont and Maine electoral votes I'm eager to transcribe and use as the opening quote of Green Mountain Cinema Vol 2, which is at last in the home stretch for publication.

    [An aside: Marge and I are dropping our satellite TV this weekend -- effective tomorrow -- in part due to Direct TV dropping, sans announcement, Fox Movie Channel last week. I had in fact set our VCR to tape a movie, the curious 1965 romantic tragedy Rapture, from FMC, only to check the tape that evening to find the blank black screen and "Contact your provider" text -- they'd fucking dropped the channel that morning! We'd been debating dropping satellite for some time, due to erratic reception and the fact we watch so little television aside from our DVD/video collection. $60+ a month for the only two programs we enjoy -- The Daily Show and Colbert Report -- was too dear a luxury, and with Direct TV's blithe drop of the one movie channel I still occasionally taped movies from, that was that. When Marge made the call, they tried to convince her to stay aboard, but couldn't provide the combo of channels we wanted -- so fuck 'em, we're better off without 'em or TV.]

    Eddie Cantor was a big star by the '30s -- among his childhood cronies was none other than Harry Donenfeld, future publisher of pulps like Spicy Stories and National Periodicals, where Harry made his fortune thanks to Superman and his royal screwjob on its creators -- and Ali Baba is the best Cantor film I've seen. Cantor plays an autograph hunter named Al Babson, who is stupidly injured on the set of an Arabian Nights movie. In a move worthy of Ash in Army of Darkness, he misremembers the prescribed dosage and takes too much pain meds, and he's off to la-la land and dreams he's in Baghdad where he's mistaken for Ali Baba. Cantor becomes prime minister to the sultan, and this is where the film escalates into a rehearsal for the Iraq War: one wonders if Rummy, Wolfowitz and the neocons saw this film in their childhoods and brainstormed the disastrous reconfiguration of the Middle East from this opus, though it's actually (in the context of its day) a satire on Roosevelt's New Deal, which the neocons & GOPs have quite successfully dismantled and sown salt upon its grave (as Hurricane Katrina so amply demonstrated). No wonder they've erected a statue to Reagan in a place of honor; it all gained traction with Reagan, and it's been a steady downhill slide since then.

    Anyhoot, Cantor mounts the first elections in Baghdad history, hoping to establish a democratic state that will simply re-install the ruling sultan, but this sweeping political reform backfires when Cantor -- ahhh, I've already given away too much. I would love a copy -- Cantor stars with Tony Martin, Roland Young, June Lang, John Carradine, Gypsy Rose Lee (billed as Louise Hovick), and there's a great number performed onscreen by Raymond Scott and His Quintet, for you Raymond Scott and cartoon music fans!

    Some sources list this as running 81 minutes, and Fox Movie Channel has it in a 90 minute timeblock, but the print we saw at Cinefest claimed to be longer than extant televised versions, sporting a pretty racist musical number that might be clipped from Fox's print.

    In any case, catch it, you'll be blown away by how this plays in the context of our own times -- and if anyone is able to tape or DVD-copy this for me, I'd welcome it and amply reward you (first come, first rewarded!) -- PO Box 47, Marlboro, VT 05344.
    ______________

    And while I'm at it, begging in the virtual street, I'll also remind folks I'm still seeking The Comics Journal back issues and happy to pay or barter -- I'm seeking TCJ #28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 41, 43, 44, 47, 50, 55, 57, 266.

    I have indeed filled whatever gaps I could from Fantagraphics's own back-issue mail order, these are the last I need to complete the collection, primarily for my CCS teaching/research use. Special thanks to Brian Defer for responding to the first request for back issues of The Comics Journal -- his requested barter gift is in the mail, so thanks, Brian!

    Friday, September 29, 2006

    Ready for "Strap 'em to a Chair" Reality?

    Before I get to the bummer reality, a quick notice for those of you in California who can take advantage of this opportunity. Compliments of Willis O'Brien fan Miron Mercury, this announcement about one of my all-time heroes, the man who essentially invented monster movies as we all know and love them -- Willis O'Brien, stop-motion animator of Edison shorts, The Ghost of Slumber Mountain, The Lost World (1925), the original King Kong (1933), Son of Kong, Mighty Joe Young (1949) and (with Pete Peterson) The Black Scorpion (1957) and The Giant Behemoth (1958):
    ______________________

    A Modest Willis O'Brien Exhibit

    Because of our mutual admiration for the art and work of Willis O'Brien I would like you to know: The Oakland Public Library, Lakeview branch, has asked for and accepted a proposal for a modest exhibition on O'Brien and his arts. The exhibition will be held November 1 to December 31, 2007.

    The approximately forty works on exhibition are divided between the biographic and the professional.

    Using 18X24inch enlargements from photographs generously given by Forry Ackerman and Darlyne O'Brien, Willis O'Brien's life and work will be seen with the addition of a large print biography.

    Similar enlargements made of storyboards for (unsold) films will be exhibited along side reproduction posters and ephemera from O'Brien's famous monsters of filmland, i.e., Lost World, King Kong, and the Academy Award winning Mighty Joe Young.

    His technical and artistic contributions to the development of stop-motion animation can only be introduced and pointed to in this exhibit which is itself a miniature.

    A typical Willis O'Brien/King Kong animation set will be represented by an enclosed tabletop set.

    O'Brien's professional film career lasted from c. 1915 to 1962. In Thomas Edison's employment (c.1915) he created a series of three-dimensional animated comedies set in prehistoric times. The Lost World (1925), King Kong (1933) and Mighty Joe Young (1949) followed. These, and other films, will be offered through the library as accompanying DVD titles to borrow.

    Pipe organ score's from The Lost World and King Kong will be performed at the nearby Grand Lake Theater during normal operating weekend hours. Kevin King, the organist, agreed to record both scores. The recorded performance will be available as a download through the web at a later date.

    Casual attendees will see how films are made by men and women just like them. They will learn about the people who made King Kong. I will draw the clear parallel between the creators of Superman and how they were treated by DC Comics and the case of Mr. Willis O'Brien, the Oaklander who gave life to King Kong. Attentive exhibit readers will discover, as we already know, that operatic ill-fates can blow on anyone.

    The exhibition is meant to publicize the humanity of Mr. O'Brien's life. The damp coastal fog of cruel obscurity on O'Brien's career needs to be vigorously blown away. This modest exhibition will be more of a zephyr.

    On January 2, 2008, when the exhibit is complete, the library will have a collection of donated DVDs and books related to O'Brien's work for everyone to watch and read happily ever after.
    During the coming year I will be scanning my small collection of O'Brien related material. I am donating my collection to the Oakland Public Library History Room which, I hope, will make it available to everyone.

    There will be a special postcard made for this exhibition. A modest card, as befits the exhibition and as surely fits ...

    ...Your animated friend,
    Miron Murcury
    _______________________

    Thanks, Miron -- and now -- on to...

    ...the bummer reality:

    Earlier this week, while chatting with my son Dan, the subject of recent movies came up and we got into it. With Halloween a'comin' in, I asked if there were any of the coming harvest he was looking forward to, and Dan said, "Ah, I'm so sick of 'strap 'em to the chair' movies" -- his terminology for the current spate of torture horror films we're enduring.

    Earlier this month, filmmaker Lance Weiler and I had a similar conversation, from the view of an insider (Lance) dealing with the current indy film scene. Producers and distributors, he said, were hot for "raw, contained horror" -- Lance's terminology for "strap 'em to the chair" pix -- meaning, cheap-to-make and currently in-vogue claustrophobic torture movies.

    In our back and forth, Lance was leery of my proposition that the contemporary subgenre of torture films had anything to do with reflecting our national zeitgeist: in the film business, all that matters is that these gorefests are fashionable (at least one studio, Lion's Gate, have built their theatrical cache on the success of this subgenre, from Rob Zombie's House of 1,000 Corpses and its nominal sequel The Devil's Rejects to the Saw franchise, which arguably made it all palatable to the money people) and most importantly cheap to produce. There's the gold standard -- The Passion of the Christ, Hostel -- and then there's the exploitation that followed in its wake.

    Lance's cynicism is understandable, but as I argued, it doesn't matter that the Bert I. Gordons and William Allands of the '50s were rushing to make giant bug and monster movies because they were relatively inexpensive to make and the unexpected success of Warner Bros. one-two punch of The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (an indy pickup, in fact) and Them! (a WB production) made it a hot genre for that decade. They still plucked a collective nerve -- the xenophobia of the Cold War incarnate, embodying all the inchoate dread of 'outsiders' in their most primal form -- and made money because of that collective reflective process. They functioned as cheap thrills -- laugh at the big bug scares -- but kept coming because people found them of use, too. Those outsized process-shot critters entertainted and spoke to us as a nation for a time.

    The torture flicks do the same.

    Yes, Lance is right: they are crowding the video shelves and popping up (less frequently) on our theater screens because Saw and Hostel popularized an remarkably streamlined, formulaic cheapjack permutation of a perpetually-popular genre (horror). But they are making money because these fucking movies speak to us about dark realities we deny about ourselves. They are exploding on screens because they speak to us about that which we won't talk about -- our current national obsession with terror, torture, demonizing enemies and objectifying 'them' as objects to be abused, while reflecting our deeper humanity: the inevitable empathy with the torture inflicted, both as the victims we "know" we are (9/11) and the victims we fear we'll be (the gov't exploited dread of becoming the next 9/11-event victim or, just as unlikely, the screaming beheading victim in some online snuff stream; the deeper dread of empathizing with those we torture in the name of God and country).

    As with any cycle, there's cream and there's crap. I saw this cycle coming, and the I knew the kid gloves were off after Mel Gibson's The Passion, which will likely remain the ultimate torture epic of all time; Mel trumped Pasolini and Salo, and that's quite an achievement. The ugly hypocrisy of the Christian right embracing this torture epic while ignoring/denying/resenting the revelations of our own country's assuming the mantle of torture-sanctioning fearmongers in the wake of Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and other detainee abuse/torture reports (including prisons in New Jersey) spotlit our national schizophrenia at that time, which was already being dissected in the early incarnations of the torture genre (The Passion, mind you, opened the door for the more exploitative fare, wherein the spectacle of pain inflicted/suffered, torn flesh, agony and spilled blood is paramount).

    The humanistic strain of the genre has been little noticed or discussed, earning little at the box office and dismissed by and large by our useless daily 'reviewers' (precious few of them are critics) as Memento rips or riffs -- The Mechanic, Head Trauma, The Jacket, etc. -- though these films have been quite articulate in their confrontational scenarios of repressed atrocities, debilatating guilt, and the toll of denial and all-consuming need to know the truth. These are redemption parables, appealing for us to literally wake up to what we've done, what we're doing, as a culture. Others (indy pickups made for precious little, but honest and direct in their focal points: Open Water, Wolf Creek) are despairing scenarios: we are lost, truly lost, and no one is going to save us.

    Both the redemptive strain and the despairing strain have yielded some memorable films, and were made with integrity and a desire to communicate something the filmmakers considered essential.

    Those voices, however lucid and clear, have been drowned out (per usual, that's how these cycles work in a free market) by the louder cacophony of horrors: the Saw franchise, Hostel, etc. I'm not attacking these films or filmmakers, mind you, just identifying what I'm seeing. I'm in a minority in my age group (50s) for finding Saw and Hostel of interest and compelling: I enjoyed them both. Saw is an amped-for-the-21st-Century variation on the Dr. Phibes films, with its own baroque Old Testament zeal and black humor at work; Hostel reflects the current generation's (of which young director Eli Roth embodies) xenophobia with unflinching clarity, as unapologetic in its self-portrait of hedonistic American male narcissism as it is fleshing out that generation's deepest post-9/11 George W. Bush presidency fear: "God, they really do hate us, don't they? They'll pay more to torture an American! They not only want us dead, they want us to suffer for who we are." Roth's narrative embraces the ultimate dread and slakes the desire for hands-on retribution, and that's its power, however risible its extremes (the rescue-the-Asian-woman, dangling optic nerve sequence).

    Whether conscious or unconsious, this inversion of the more intelligent redemption/despair is telling and important: The Mechanic, Head Trauma, The Jacket posit: "why must I suffer? What suffering have I afflicted? What have I done?" Hostel counters: "why must I suffer for just being who I am: an American? I've done nothing wrong!"

    Here, then, is the national debate we never had going into Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the 2004 election season. It's playing out in movies dismissed by most discerning adult filmviewers as trash, beneath contempt; in the movies younger audiences are paying to see, with the same fusion of dread and anticipation that young audiences brought to the horror cycles of the '50s, '60s, '70s, '80s, '90s -- arguably more naked in their expression of that dread, stripped of comfy genre metaphors (vampires, giant monsters, zombies, boogymen) to rougher archetypes: torturers, sans apparent motive.

    Sublimated fears and perceptions aren't being openly discussed, debated: they're playing out in this earliest 21st Century strain of horrors and on Comedy Central, where and The Daily Show and The Colbert Report bring the mirror of satire to play with equally savage precision. (So successful is the Comedy Central model that Fox News is imitating it and presenting it as "news" -- see below.)

    That these horror films are more graphic, explicit, and to-the-bone (in their pain as well as their all too human monsters) is understandable in the light of a President, Vice President and administration so naked in their enthusiasm, their need, to torture.

    At least we're spared the argument that horror films caused the aberrant real-life behavior: we're clearly seeing quite the opposite.

    When the word "torture" is so relentlessly side-stepped -- "alternative interrogation tactics," etc. -- but the reality is so obvious in the photos we've seen (begging the question, "what haven't we seen?", not out of morbidity but dread -- "if we've done this, what else has been done in our name?"), the fictional models are inevitably extreme.

    That's what nightmares do; that's what the horror genre does.

    If it's this bad in reality, it's much, much worse in the imaginative realms -- and when the imagination fails to approach the reality, the need to escalate the imagined horrors becomes a genre imperative.

    However gruesome the coming wave of "strap 'em to the chair" offerings coming our way -- Saw III, etc. -- they've already been eclipsed by what's happened and happening in Washington D.C. right now. If President Bush's call for justified torture during his recent pre-9/11 Anniversary campaign season madness was outrageous and audacious,
  • the Congress-sanctioned demise of Habeas Corpus
  • is even more appalling.

    If you're among those appalled by the torture movie wave, you have to admit
  • reasoned, nuanced discussion rooted in history and fact
  • has failed (did you read that link? Did you see the word "Athens" and go, "ah, why bother?"). The more realistic, politically-gr0unded films on this subject -- The Road to Guantanamo, etc. -- do not find an audience, reaching only a fraction of the converted. Horror movies make money; horror movies, consciously and/or unconsciously, tap our inner reality. Political movies rarely do.

    What are we left with? Torture movies and a bully President and administration getting its way again, aggressively pursuing its own agenda and embodying our worst instincts, an either spineless or locked-step-fascist representative branch betraying our Constitution in constant deference to the executive branch, which has already proven itself capable of deceit, media manipulation, strong-arm tactics, smear tactics and abuse to retain its hold on power (and that power must be increasingly absolute).

    So, we get torture movies.

    Why?

    Because we have been and are torturing innocent people.

    The last aggressive torture wave emerged from the Vietnam era, when we were doing the same; the big-budget studio remakes of that era's artifacts (Michael Bay-produced Texas Chainsaws) are as timely as the Saw franchise and the others I've mentioned.

    Bush's constant assertion and presumption -- that he and his only capture and torture bad guys -- has been proven demonstratably wrong time and time again, and know we have the harrowing account of Canadian citizen Maher Arar to contend with.

    Are our Congressmen deaf? Dumb? Blind?

    You want the season's darkest horror movie, read on:
    ___________

    Maher Arar's account:


    "I am not a terrorist. I am not a member of Al Qaeda and I do not know any one who belongs to this group. All I know about Al Qaeda is what I have seen in the media. I have never been to Afghanistan. I have never been anywhere near Afghanistan and I do not have any desire to ever go to Afghanistan.

    Now, let me tell you who I am.

    I am a Syrian-born Canadian. I moved here with my parents when I was seventeen years old. I went to university and studied hard, and eventually obtained a Masters degree in telecommunications. I met my wife, Monia at McGill University. We fell in love and eventually married in 1994. I knew then that she was special, but I had no idea how special she would turn out to be.

    If it were not for her I believe I would still be in prison...

    They told me that based on classified information that they could not reveal to me, I would be deported to Syria. I said again that I would be tortured there. Then they read part of the document where it explained that INS was not the body that deals with Geneva Convention regarding torture.

    Then they took me outside into a car and drove me to an airport in New Jersey. Then they put me on a small private jet. I was the only person on the plane with them. I was still chained and shackled. We flew first to Washington. A new team of people got on the plane and the others left. I overheard them talking on the phone, saying that Syria was refusing to take me directly, but Jordan would take me.

    Then we flew to Portland, to Rome, and then to Amman, Jordan. All the time I was on the plane I was thinking how to avoid being tortured. I was very scared. We landed in Amman at 3 in the morning local time on October 9th.

    They took me out of plane and there were six or seven Jordanian men waiting for us. They blindfolded and chained me, and put me in a van.

    They made me bend my head down in the back seat. Then, these men started beating me. Every time I tried to talk they beat me. For the first few minutes it was very intense.

    Thirty minutes later we arrived at a building where they took off my blindfold and asked routine questions, before taking me to a cell. It was around 4:30 in the morning on October 9. Later that day, they took my fingerprints, and blindfolded me and put me in a van. I asked where I was going, and they told me I was going back to Montreal.

    About forty-five minutes later, I was put into a different car. These men started beating me again. They made me keep my head down, and it was very uncomfortable, but every time I moved, they beat me again. Over an hour later we arrived at what I think was the border with Syria. I was put in another car and we drove for another three hours.

    I was taken into a building, where some guards went through my bags and took some chocolates I bought in Zurich. I asked one of the people where I was and he told me I was in the Palestine branch of the Syrian military intelligence. It was now about 6 in the evening on October 9.

    If I did not answer quickly enough, he would point to a metal chair in the corner and ask "Do you want me to use this?" I did not know then what that chair was for. I learned later it was used to torture people.

    I was taken into a building, where some guards went through my bags and took some chocolates I bought in Zurich. I asked one of the people where I was and he told me I was in the Palestine branch of the Syrian military intelligence. It was now about 6 in the evening on October 9.

    Three men came and took me into a room. I was very, very scared. They put me on a chair, and one of the men started asking me questions. I later learned this man was a colonel. He asked me about my brothers, and why we had left Syria. I answered all the questions.

    If I did not answer quickly enough, he would point to a metal chair in the corner and ask "Do you want me to use this?" I did not know then what that chair was for. I learned later it was used to torture people.

    I asked him what he wanted to hear. I was terrified, and I did not want to be tortured. I would say anything to avoid torture. This lasted for four hours. There was no violence, only threats this day. At about 1 in the morning, the guards came to take me to my cell downstairs.

    We went into the basement, and they opened a door, and I looked in. I could not believe what I saw. I asked how long I would be kept in this place. He did not answer, but put me in and closed the door. It was like a grave. It had no light. It was three feet wide. It was six feet deep.

    It was seven feet high. It had a metal door, with a small opening in the door, which did not let in light because there was a piece of metal on the outside for sliding things into the cell.

    There was a small opening in the ceiling, about one foot by two feet with iron bars. Over that was another ceiling, so only a little light came through this. There were cats and rats up there, and from time to time the cats peed through the opening into the cell. There were two blankets, two dishes and two bottles. One bottle was for water and the other one was used for urinating during the night. Nothing else. No light.

    I spent ten months, and ten days inside that grave.

    The next day I was taken upstairs again. The beating started that day and was very intense for a week, and then less intense for another week. That second and the third days were the worst. I could hear other prisoners being tortured, and screaming and screaming. Interrogations are carried out in different rooms.

    One tactic they use is to question prisoners for two hours, and then put them in a waiting room, so they can hear the others screaming, and then bring them back to continue the interrogation.

    The cable is a black electrical cable, about two inches thick. They hit me with it everywhere on my body. They mostly aimed for my palms, but sometimes missed and hit my wrists they were sore and red for three weeks. They also struck me on my hips, and lower back. Interrogators constantly threatened me with the metal chair, tire and electric shocks.

    They used the cable on the second and third day, and after that mostly beat me with their hands, hitting me in the stomach and on the back of my neck, and slapping me on the face. Where they hit me with the cables, my skin turned blue for two or three weeks, but there was no bleeding. At the end of the day they told me tomorrow would be worse. So I could not sleep.

    Then on the third day, the interrogation lasted about eighteen hours.

    They beat me from time to time and make me wait in the waiting room for one to two hours before resuming the interrogation. While in the waiting room I heard a lot of people screaming. They wanted me to say I went to Afghanistan. This was a surprise to me. They had not asked about this in the United States.

    They kept beating me so I had to falsely confess and told them I did go to Afghanistan. I was ready to confess to anything if it would stop the torture. They wanted me to say I went to a training camp. I was so scared I urinated on myself twice."
    ___________________

    There's more, much more... but if you're still with me, I'm surprised.

    You won't find that account on TV news, or most new venues.

    CNN is so depleted they're illiciting "I Report" footage from their viewers: the corporate journalism model at its current nadir (reporting is, natch, the hard part).

    Fox News (the contemptable bastards -- it still blows my mind that so many diehard xenophobic American apologists swear by a news corporation owned by an Australian media mogul) are too busy stringing together clips of President Clinton's assertion he tried to kill Osama bin Laden (snipped from his onscreen outrage at the latest round of GOP pass-the-buck-we're-not-responsible bullshit) with Nickelodeon footage of a little girl (acting) horrified at someone saying they killed Santa Claus to counter, for a nanosecond, what we did to Maher Arar and are doubtlessly doing to other innocents.

    Hell, Fox News wants blood, as they have since their inception. Oh, how fucking funny. I almost choked in rage when I caught this clip at the end of Fox News's Tuesday night session after midnight: Clinton killed Santa.

    That's news?

    You caustic fucks.

    Why torture movies?

    Because the American ideal has collapsed, in the eyes of the world and in our own eyes:

    We have been tortured; we are torturers.

    Our government is led by Leatherface's mock-Texan (born in CT) brother, and his chickenhawk appetite for blood -- his craving for terror, the word he so savors, that spills from his lips more than any single other -- is unslakeable.

    The new horror movies provide rehearsals for either scenario:

    This is what it feels like to suffer.

    This is what it feels like to make others suffer.

    This is what it feels like to not survive.

    This is what it feels like to survive.

    This is what it feels like to be consumed by guilt for something I deny, or forgot, I did.

    This is what it feels like to avenge myself on my tormentors.

    This is what it feels like to survive but never confront my tormentor.

    This is what America is feeling, seeing, being, denying.

    This is the level of debate most of our younger voters -- who do not vote -- are finding within their reach.

    Bon Appetit.






    Thursday, September 28, 2006

    The 9/11 No One Speaks Of

    Compliments of HomeyM (now of Jamiaca, VT), a reflection on NYC in the wake of 9/11 -- recalling a spirit that I didn't once here, read, see referred to in the month of September, 2006:

    I lived within the original Ground Zero perimeter, in lower Manhattan, during 9/11. It was, to the say least, a very special, a one-of-a-kind experience.

    For at least a week, maybe two weeks, every New Yorker I could see (and for the first few days, almost no one came out onto the streets, it was like pioneering to do so) was in a quiet, reflective space, like dreaming while awake. Pretty soon shrines (photos, candles, flowers, handwritten sayings) appeared on almost every corner and in many window sills. Storekeepers (most stores were closed; a single
    NY Times was shared by a whole area of five square blocks and so on) were giving water and food to folks who were convoying down to the smoking site (a huge smoke cloud with bodies in stood between earth and sky for many weeks), to begin picking up the two largest buildings in the world. There were even pay phones that worked without paying.

    It was not a time to be selfish.

    After a few days, maybe two people, and the number grew every day, would gather at Union Square at 14th Street and 4th Avenue in the evening, to speak their feelings. All around Union Square, as well as Washington Square and most other parks, certainly in lower Manhattan, were spontaneously created these larger shrine-like displays, contributed to by many people. Sayings were pinned to the cyclone fences. Everyone was serious and thoughtful, and we would often look each other deeply in the eyes without saying anything. One would see certain people one had not seen in many years, they would just appear walking on the nearly empty sidewalk, when you ventured outside.


    No one was about revenge. That was just not the point.

    Anyway, as this went on into the second week, most people I spoke to (usually brief, simple, meaningful conversations) shared the thought and question, "Will we retain this feeling, or will it in a few months go back just to the same busyness and brusqueness, the way it had always been in NYC?" We pretty much knew it would be going back to that, but would something be retained, and/or how could some of this wonderful spirit be retained.

    [From this I formulated the concept of "Keep It Alive," which was to be that every Friday night in certain parks, such as Union Square, a microphone would be hooked into a simple amp monitor, such as musicians use, and people would take their turns for a few minutes each, just freely expressing their hearts to the gathered group. It would be a weekly ritual of sharing of feelings and thoughts, not a debate (although some of that would be inevitable) but just letting someone speak. The underlying point would be to keep alive the spirit of love, reflection, listening, openness, the whole spiritual quality that had opened up in response to 9/11 event.


    A year later (could it have been only a year?), I moved to Vermont, and I radio show based on free and open conversation, on radio free brattleboro, and decided to call it... "Keep It Alive."]

    So, my point is that indeed eventually things did go back to "normal" so that there was no apparent trace of this special spirit that everyone was feeling for awhile. Human beings do have the potential to live truly spiritual lives, but the "system" is such that it will disappear very shortly after something especially tragic has elicited it.

    Monday, September 25, 2006

    Monday Blah Blah Blahs


    Ah, fuck shit, it's Monday, in't it?

    Bad enough that yesterday was punctuated by the closing down of our local Route 9, preventing any passage from here to Brattleboro -- no matinee as planned, no bringing my son Dan up for supper -- but I'm not bitching about that, cuz it was a way worse Sunday for the as-yet unnamed poor bastard on a motorcycle who crossed the center line on Route 9 and slammed head-on in a semi coming the other direction.

    Hence the closing of Route 9 for 3+ hours.

    Jeeeeeeee-sus.

    This is the third biker accident I know of on that route caused by crossing the center line, a practice I see many cars indulge in as well on that curvy bit of road.

    No, that was bad, but things are worse all over.

    We've collectively crossed the center line, and the semi's unforgiving grill is a hair-breadth away, and we act like it simply isn't happening.

    I'm fuming this morning over our current ruling patriarchs, who blithely
  • deny both the real-world repercussions of their actions on the global stage -- repercussions many of us predicted, seeing how the military solution would play into Osama's plan all along,
  • while remaining blissfully uncaring of
  • and the most intimate consequences of their domineering bullshit (check out the Monday, September 18, 2006 post), too. Why care about Global Warming, right?

  • Man, I could go on and on, but you know the routine (and if you don't, you've successfully negotiated burying your head-in-ass neck deep).

    Can nothing knock these arrogant motherfuckers off their high horse? Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, all of 'em speak of "freedom" and wrap that word around their every callous decision or action, like it's a lozenge to ease the pain of Guantanamo force-feeding tubes or lubricant for the latest population-wide ass-reaming they're indulging.

    Though I know it will be dire times for everyone, I really can't wait for this US Empire to fall to its bloody knees. We deserve whatever happens to us.
  • The latest torture vote after an ultimately compromised stand by principled Republicans
  • really is the last straw: we're hopeless.

    We can talk all we want about American ideals, we've sold them all down the river and are too busy indignantly waving flags to notice or care. We lie, wage war for no stated reason, torture, kidnap, imprison without the acknowledging the basest rule of international law, wring our hands over General Motors like it isn't endemic of the whole shooting-match -- and that's just the tip of the iceberg.

    Which is, like, melting away at a faster rate than scientists had previously calculated, based on the erosive impact of hidden 'black lakes' and such, though Bush thinks it's all as illusory as "evilution."

    But, hey, it's Monday, right?

    Must just be Monday.

    I'm off to work -- you want cheerier reading, check out my weekend posts you might have missed as yet. I didn't even mention Chavez or The Devil once.

    It's all about Cthulhu, who's looking friendlier by the minute.

    Move over, Barney; Cthulhu has a song to sing.

    Hmmm, wait a minute, this is cheering me up.

    Heck, it's election season -- six weeks to go -- let's think outside the box.

    And remember -- the Old Ones just need a little doorway to make it all theirs.

    We won't have to wait until November 2008!

    Vote in a few Cthulhu cronies, and the whole shithouse goes up in chunks!

    They'll just move right in, like shit through a goose, like ten tanks overthrowing the Korean government!

    Cthulhu is a great alternative to two more years of Bush!

    Bring on the reign of the Old Ones!

    If we're going to suffer patriarchs, let's at least suffer beneath the yoke of elder beings that predate humanity!

    Nyarlanthotep
    for Vice President! He's cuddlier by far than Dickless Cheney! At least Nyarlanthotep's mouth isn't permanently screwed into that perpetually smug Cheney used-car dealer sneer. Hell, Nyar hasn't even got lips to curl at you. Bring on Nyarlanthotep!

    You want "extraordinary rendition" as sanctioned government policy? Hell, the sentient Fungi from Yogguth perfected those practices strange eons ago! Who needs secret CIA Eurocamps or alien abductions when you've got a six-foot crustacean with pyramid-like heaps of throbbing tubing where a head should be cheerfully spiriting your sorry ass away for dabbling where you shouldn't dabble?

    Anti-choice pro-life policies getting you down? Let Shub-Niggurath, the Goat with a Thousand Young, amp the pro-life agenda! Fecundity Uber Alle! Take that, Christian right-wingers! Let your yeasty wombs spew forth hundreds of drownable toddlers! Go ahead, womb-coveters, hack open those distended bellies, the young will spill out and feed upon your luckless limbs! Let's see if your Jesus Camp wargames for kids can stand up to a righteous dose of Shub-lips's wrath!

    Ah, Monday.

    Glad to brighten your day.

    (Hey, if Pluto really isn't a planet any longer, does that mean Yogguth is?)

    Sunday, September 24, 2006

    Horror in the Hills:
    Lovecraft in Vermont... Coming in October!



    On the weekend of October 20th, the first (hopefully annual)
  • Lovecraft in Vermont
  • gathering of H.P. Lovecraft readers, fans, buffs, scholars, and the simply curious will take place in and around Dummerston, VT, just north of Brattleboro.

    The cause for celebration: Lovecraft's visit to this part of my home state 80 years ago, in the late 1920s (actually just south of Brattleboro, in Guilford), a trip that inspired Lovecraft's single Vermont-based tale of horror, "The Whisperer in the Darkness."

    Organizer Alan D. Eames (author of the definitive Secret Life of Beer: Legends, Lore & Little-Known Facts, 1995) has been pulling this event together since spring, when he called VT folklorist, horror novelist and my great amigo Joe Citro and I to the Eames estate for a brief powwow about Alan's dreams and schemes.

    Joe and I will be participating, on some level, but this is Alan's baby: The Beer King is trading crowns to honor the creator of the Old Ones, and the festivities are promising to spice the foliage season in ways never before imagined.

    Thus far, my sole concrete contribution has been to organize the weekend's film program, negotiating with VT filmmaker Jayson Argento (here's a pic of the thrall from Jayson's film) and The H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society to arrange for a double-feature screening. First up will be Argento's latest short film,
  • The Cthulhu Chronicles: Episode One: The Ropes (2006),
  • followed by our festival feature, the marvelous faux-silent adaptation of Lovecraft's 1926 tale
  • The Call of Cthulhu (2005).

  • It turns out the Lovecraft Historical Society folks responsible for that gem are coming to Vermont in the spring to make a new Lovecraft film, and I for one am overjoyed to know this is in the works.

    Anyhoot, about the Lovecraft in VT event: I'll be delivering an illustrated lecture on Lovecraft in comics & film as a lead-in to the films, and Alan will be posting more info as the schedule of events congeals
  • here,
  • so keep tabs on that site as the leaves change colors and the nights grow colder.

    FYI, here's my bio for Alan's site, which I've taken the liberty to footnote a bit for your Sunday entertainment and enlightenment.

    See some of you in October!
    ______________

    As a native Vermonter, it would be suitably romantic to cite my entry point into H.P. Lovecraft’s universe as “The Whisperer in the Darkness,” but that isn’t true, and I won’t pretend it is.

    The first Lovecraft story I ever read was in a black-cloth-covered, dust-jacketless collection of horror stories my mother inexplicably owned. Truth to tell, it was Henry Kuttner’s “The Graveyard Rats” (1936) that made the greater impression on me at the relatively tender age of ten, an impact so overwhelming that I simply can’t recall another story I read in that anthology off the top of my head, and can’t lay hands on it today to check which Lovecraft story lurked between its covers. As a child, I was terrified to revisit the book, and Lovecraft interested me not at all until my curiosity was aroused two years later by the announcement in one of the monster magazines that Lovecraft’s “The Colour Out of Space” was about to be adapted into a film starring Boris Karloff (which was shot under the title The House at the End of the World and eventually released in the US as Die, Monster, Die!).

    This prompted me to scour, fruitlessly, two local libraries, neither of which harbored a single fragment of fiction by Lovecraft (whose name prompted suspicion from Mrs. Post, our venerable Waterbury VT librarian, who must have thought I was referring to some sort of sex manual, given her initial reaction to my boyish queries; she looked enormously relieved when I explained he wrote horror stories). Fortunately, the Lancer paperback The Colour Out of Space and Others, with its lurid (and patently fake) ‘flaming skull’ photo cover, popped up on the paperback racks next to the new Bantam Doc Savage titles.

    [Note: I was a huge Doc Savage fan at this age, devouring every one of the Bantam paperbacks -- and no doubt about it, it was the James Bama covers that caught my eye first and every time. Like many young Doc Savage readers, it took about a dozen books for the template to grow too repetitive, by which time I'd discovered Lovecraft, Bradbury and Matheson -- the holy trinity that defined much of my teen reading appetite. Prior to this, it was Verne, Wells and Poe for me; of those pre-Lovecraft discoveries, only Wells and Poe retained my interest as I matured. BTW, the Waterbury Library still stands, and it was a great library when I was a kid -- it had a second floor museum collection that included a real mummy; a basement and attic filled with musty stacks of old magazines I combed and studied, using the Periodical Index as my guide; and occasional 16mm film shows, including my first exposure to Jiri Trnka. I believe Mrs. Post's first name was Emily -- I kid you not -- and she guided me thoughtfully and patiently through my formative reading years, easing me past my little boy fascination for dinosaurs into sampling Jules Verne, H.G. Wells, Jack London and much, much more.]

    I snapped it up for a fat 60 cents -- well, ‘snap’ isn’t the correct word, as the cover price was a sacrifice I pondered for some stretch. Those six dimes could also yield somewhere between three and five comics, depending on which publisher or whether I was buying regular-sized 12-centers or 25-cent annuals. But my curiosity was too great, and thus I entered consciously Lovecraft’s literary realm and broke my Cthulhu cherry once and for all (the loss of my physical virginity would have to wait).

    [A long time.]

    “Colour Out of Space” was among the most horrific stories I’d ever read up to that time in my life, almost blowing “The Graveyard Rats” out of its primo position. It was an ideal intro to Lovecraft, melding as it did more traditional science-fiction elements (the meteor and its mutations) with an evocative backwoods reality I bought into without hesitation. Lovecraft’s invented rural Massachusetts setting held the allure of being “far away” from my home in Duxbury, VT -- hence, exotic -- while sounding like the deep woods I loved to hike along the Winooski and around the parameters of Camel’s Hump. Nahum Gardner could have been one of my woodchuck neighbors, like the Pelkeys, the Chamberlains, or the deer-hunting clan of Benoits. This made the mounting horror of Nahum’s degeneration and fate all the more palpable and arresting. Having already steeped myself in Poe, I thought few things I could find in books could or would raise my hackles (and gorge) the way films like Mario Bava’s Black Sunday had, but ol’ H.P.’s deceptively casual turn of phrase to describe Nahum’s demise -- “That which spoke could speak no more because it had completely caved in” -- hit me like a hammer blow. I almost tasted vomit; no writer had ever done this to me.

    I was hooked for life.

    That Lancer collection also featured H.P.’s “Cool Air,” which I loved and immediately recognized, with some excitement, as kin to Poe’s “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar,” my all-time favorite Poe tale (which I would years later try to film on Super 8mm, using stop-motion animation to simulate Valdemar’s rapid decay, with humiliatingly risible results).

    [Note: This attempt to film a Poe short story pretty much capped my 8mm filmmaking years. Working with my close friends Bill Hunter -- who made more 8mm and Super8 films than I, and went to Boston to study filmmaking before his tragic death -- and Alan Finn, we set up a stop-motion animation set on the top of my desk blotter in my bedroom in my family's Colbyville, VT home. Using a tripod extended to its limit atop the desk, with the camera lens aiming down full-face at my crude facsimile of Valdemar -- a plasticene and clay mock-up sculpted in anatomically-correct layers of red and orange muscle and gray skin upon a Remco model of the human skull, with glass eyes set into the sockets -- Bill, Alan and I shot the disintegration frame-by-frame.

    It took, as I recall, two full days. My most imaginative effects flourish, or so I thought, was the replacement of the glass eyes with egg yolks at the predetermined stage of decay; to my delight, the yolks gradually shrank under the hot lights we were filming with. To everyone's growing disgust, they also began to stink.

    Nevertheless, we persevered, and after two full days and nights of frame-by-frame filming, we wrapped the sequence and eagerly mailed the unexposed film reel to Kodak for development (there were no quick-development photo booths around in those days, not in Waterbury, anyway; Vincent's Pharmacy was our 8mm and Super8 development venue, via their shipping the film to Burlington or wherever to return days later. When the developed reel returned, we eagerly met and screened it -- and Alan and Bill were literally in tears with laughter. I was simply mortified. The fruit of all our labors didn't look at all as we'd envisioned it: it looked like a fake clay head, essentially unzipping up the front and peeling away. The eyes "rotting" indeed looked cool, but it all went by so fast, it looked ridiculous.

    I recall watching this footage over and over, calculating where we went wrong -- we shot have shot two-to-four frames per change, not one! -- but my disappointment was so great that I abandoned the ambitious adaptation of Valdemar and relegated my filmmaking to the occasional experimental film, requiring no such special effects extravaganzas.]


    I was also fascinated with the seminal “The Call of The Cthulhu,” the first horror story I found myself revisiting annually. It defied the formulaic template of most horror I’d been exposed to up to that point in my life, and didn’t seem to make much narrative sense, but I couldn’t shake the damned story. It haunted me and wielded some sort of terrible internal logic I couldn’t articulate or fully grasp, painting pictures in my mind while eluding any rational analysis. Still being a devout Catholic lad (that, too, would soon change), I think in retrospect “Call of Cthulhu” plucked the same nerves so much of the irrational Catholic dread I’d grown up with had fine tuned. Lovecraft’s fusion of elder prehuman deities, outsized primordial beings and cult fanaticism perfectly suited this dino-loving churchgoing Catechism-attending Yankee youth’s confusions, where nuns and priests unabashedly pronounced unknowable truths about the afterlife and arcane religious dogma -- and yet were forever flummoxed at my feeble attempts to make sense of the schism between the fossil record and the Biblical record, usually fomenting punishment. Once he emerged in the story’s rousing climax, Cthulhu proved to be everything the name “Godzilla” had promised, but cheated on -- an embodiment of ultimate supernatural power and prehistoric monster, church and monster incarnate -- sans the man-in-suit silliness of the Toho movies. I must also note that it was Lovecraft’s use of piecemeal narrative fragments in “The Call of Cthulhu” -- diaries, newspaper clippings, etc. -- that made Bram Stoker’s Dracula alluring to me for the first time in my life, whetting my appetite for later outings with Borges in my post-high-school and college years.

    The other stories in the Lancer paperback -- “The Picture in the House,” “The Terrible Old Man,” “The Whisperer in the Darkness” -- struck me then as ephemeral or silly, and I couldn’t make head nor tails out of “The Shadow Out of Time,” which simply confounded and bored me. Only later in my teenage years, revisiting the story, did it work for me; by then, my Lancer paperback was a tattered shell, its tablet-like binding dissolving like Nahum’s face, the purple-edged pages loosely sheathed by the faded cover.

    Although I came to love “The Whisperer in the Darkness” later in life, primarily for being set in my home state and for its suffocating atmosphere and chilling final movement, I still think it’s undermined by one of Lovecraft’s stupidest conceits. It’s a neat touch that its alien interlopers are linked with the floating carcasses of the historic 1927 flood, but the Mi-Gos -- ruddy man-sized soft-shelled crustaceans with fleshy wings sprouting from their spines, capable of flying (!) to the Green Mountains from distant Yuggoth -- mesh clumsily with Vermont landscape, lore and Lovecraftian zoology, their interstellar travel amplifying their patent absurdity well beyond the breaking point. It’s as if one of the hilarious species of space monster I used to laugh at Ultraman battling weekly on Canadian TV had spilled into the Lovecraft universe, or Yog, Monster from Space had supplanted Cthulhu -- too bad. It is, otherwise, a marvelous story.

    [Note: For the sake of accurate chronology, it must be noted that Toho's Space Amoeba, released stateside by AIP as Yog, Monster from Space, wouldn't hit any screens until after 1971 -- a few years after my initial reading of the Lancer Lovecraft paperback -- so I'm cheating more than a little with this glib analogy. But what the fuck, eh? By the time I'd re-read and fell in love at last with Lovecraft's mongrel mythos tale, I had seen Yog on a double feature with The Return of Count Yorga during a big-fun night out with George and Steve Woodard at the Paramount Theater in Barre, VT, so the integrity of my chronology is correct.]

    Like most aspiring young artists and writers smitten with Lovecraft’s fiction as a youth, the most recognizable mark left upon me by H.P. crept into my creative writing assignments. My English teachers and first junior high creative writing teacher (Carol Collins, 8th grade, Harwood Union High School) adjusted reluctantly to my predilection for writing horror, but winced at my emulating the most superficial aspects of Lovecraft’s prose. Carol in particular valiantly struggled with my preference for flamboyant Lovecraftian terminology and relentless abuse of adjectives; why use one when six would do the trick? I recall her patiently showing me a thesaurus, making me turn the pages and urging me to use it at all times, explaining why “ichor” wasn’t the best word to use over and over again as my nominal hero (who, of course, went mad in the final paragraph) hacked away at the scaly monstrosity I described in such excruciating, loving detail.

    I got over that habit, though I still treasure the multipage list of Lovecraftian adjectives poet and underground comix writer extraordinaire Tom Veitch gave me years later. Nevertheless, my artwork would forever reflect the malignant influence of Lovecraft’s imagery.

    There are some things you simply can’t and don’t outgrow.

    But oh, those Mi-Gos -- damn, they are silly-ass monsters.
    _______________

    PS to yesterday's post: Thanks to Brian Defer for responding to the request for back issues of The Comics Journal -- I'm still seeking TCJ #28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 41, 43, 44, 47, 50, 55, 57, 266. Thanks, Brian!
    _________________

    Saturday, September 23, 2006

    What the -- ??

    I paid $2.35 a gallon for gas yesterday.

    With foliage season approaching in about a week or two, this can't last long in this neck of the woods -- but what the hell?

    The plummeting gas prices (from a high of $3+ per gallon for regular) over the past month has been positively eerie -- this email this morning from HomeyM in Jamiaca, VT sums up my own thoughts:

    "They're up to something. They don't cut profits just to be nice. My guess is we will be at war with Iran in a month or two, after we are lulled into feeling good about lower gas prices. Karl Rove does nothing without a purpose; usually it's a diversionary tactic to keep your eyes off something else. Or else it is to help the Republicans in the Nov. election, i.e. to mitigate the impact of the negative coattails of George Walker Bush just enough to keep Republican control of the Congress. Then jack up those gas prices again with nothing left to lose.

    Whatever it is, and your guess is as good as mine, they are definitely up to something by having their refiner friends and partners in business crime lower the gas prices. No logic to it all with winter coming on and more oil shortages ahead."
    ______________

    Heads up, anyone who can help:

    Among my many teaching and research resources is a sizeable collection of comics magazines and fanzines. I've pulled together and combed (donating all my doubles to either The Center for Cartoon Studies and/or HUIE Library/Henderson State University's collections) all my back issues of The Comics Journal, but I'm still seeking the following back issues -- if anyone out there can help me, either via sale, trade or donation, I'd be very appreciative!

    (Hey, Steve P, if you hadn't tossed out your collection years ago,
    I'd have paid you some $$ and this list would be shorter!)

    Seeking The Comics Journal
    #28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 57, 266.

    Thanks! You can email me directly at msbissette@yahoo.com...

    Friday, September 22, 2006

    Charles L. Grant (1942-2006)
    Ode to a Good Man & Great Writer

    [The following obituary was scribed by Douglas Winter and Tom McDonald; I present here complete.]

    Born September 12, 1942, Hackettstown, New Jersey
    Died September 15, 2006, Newton, New Jersey

    Charles Lewis Grant, 64, one of the post-war generation’s most honored and influential fantasy and horror writers, died of a heart attack at home in Newton, New Jersey, following a long illness. The son of an Episcopalian priest, Grant attended Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, with thoughts of following in his father’s footsteps; but he soon changed his majors to English and History. After graduation from Trinity in 1964, he returned to New Jersey (the setting for all of his major novels) to teach high school. His first serious efforts at writing fiction came in 1966, when he attended the meetings of a local writers’ club. In April 1968, he made his first sale, to The Magazine of Fantasy of Science Fiction. Later that month, he was drafted into the U.S. Army, and served in Vietnam with the Military Police at Qui Nhon, where he was seriously wounded twice.

    After two years of active duty, Grant returned to teaching, but dedicated himself to writing, producing five novels that were never published. His first published novel, The Shadow of Alpha (1976), as well as Ascension (1977) and Legion (1979) were science fiction, but he soon shifted his attention to horror, creating the “Oxrun Station” series, which includes the novels The Hour of the Oxrun Dead (1977), The Sound of Midnight (1978), The Last Call of Mourning (1979), The Grave (1981), The Bloodwind (1982), The Soft Whisper of the Dead (1982), The Dark Cry of the Moon and The Long Night of the Grave (both 1986), as well as two collections of novelettes, Nightmare Seasons (1982) and The Orchard (1985).

    In 1978, Grant unveiled the short story anthology series Shadows, setting a new and insistently literary standard for horror fiction anthologies. In the introduction to its first volume, Grant offered his enduring manifesto, championing “a quiet way to scream” – a literature of “dark fantasy” that became known as “quiet horror.”

    Although critically acclaimed as a writer and editor, Grant sometimes wrote pseudonymously for financial or simply entertaining reasons. He penned a best-selling series of romances as Felicia Andrews; occult adventure novels as Geoffrey Marsh; humorous fantasies and other novels as Lionel Fenn, Timothy Boggs, Mark Rivers, and Simon Lake. But his devotion to horror fiction was unrelenting – as witness the novels Night Songs (1984), The Tea Party (1985), The Pet (1986), For Fear of the Night (1988), In a Dark Dream (1989), Stunts (1990), Something Stirs (1991), Raven (1993), Jackals (1994); his “Millennium Quartet,” Symphony (1997), In the Mood (1998), Chariot (1998), and Riders in the Sky (1999); his “Black Oak” series; his final story collection The Black Carousel (1995); and two New York Times best-selling “X-Files” novels.

    Grant wrote more than 110 books and 200 short stories, and edited more than two dozen short fiction anthologies. He received (among other awards and honors) the Nebula, World Fantasy, British Fantasy, and Bram Stoker Awards. He was also presented with Lifetime Achievement Awards from the Horror Writers Association, the British Fantasy Society, and the World Horror Convention. He was a past president of the Horror Writers Association and past Vice President of the Science Fiction Writers of America. As writer, editor, mentor, and friend, he nurtured the careers of countless younger writers throughout the world.

    Grant is survived by his wife of 24 years, Kathryn Ptacek of Newton; his brother, John C. Grant of Washington, New Jersey; a son, Ian M. Grant and his wife Caroline of Juneau, Alaska; a daughter, Emily Stalnaker and her husband Aaron of Akron, Ohio; two grandchildren, Payton M. Grant and Aaron Robert Stalnaker; and many cousins. He was predeceased by his parents, Reverend Sydney E. and Minerva (Clark) Grant.

    In lieu of flowers, the family requests donations to the Charles L. Grant Memorial Fund, which will be established to help further the careers of young writers and editors of fantasy and horror fiction.
    _________________

    A few of my own memories:

    I got to know Charlie during my years attending Necon, the annual summer retreat for horror writers, and via my membership in the Horror Writers of America (now the Horror Writers Association, reflecting its international scope of members). I was in awe of just about everyone at Necon, and given my familiarity with Charlie's horror fiction (I still haven't read his sf, sorry to say), I was in particular awe of Mr. Grant.

    As a man, he was almost iconic in his embodiment of what a writer is, was, should be: intent in all matters upon how it applied to writing -- the art and the life --- and how writing applied to the subject at hand. He moved around the Rhode Island Roger Williams College campus like a vet faculty member, striding with that sturdy body language fixed between radiating the arrogance of owning the place, hunkered a bit in acknowledgement that the damnable place might really own him.

    That mix of bravado and vulnerability vanished as soon as he was one-on-one with anyone in conversation, particularly since writing and horror were always the primary hot topics at Necon -- Charlie owned that turf. Period.

    Charlie was a constant presence, clearly one of the scene's key people and a fierce curmudgeon when provoked or feeling like being left alone. Panels were instantly livelier if Charlie was part of 'em, coming across like a surly lion when forced to contend with transitional subjects he found frivolous ("splatterpunk", anyone?), passionate and articulate when talking about the life of a writer -- the working writer, as Charlie's own credentials (including pseudonames) amply embodied; he had little or no patience for "lazy writers" -- or his favorite genre and its magic & potential.

    Charlie was initially quite gruff with me -- I was, at the time, a bit of an interloper, "that comics guy" who was bleeding into horror writing via my writing on horror films for fanzines and zines and my initial tentative stabs at published short fiction. My growing argumentative during "That Damned Game Show" when an answer I gave -- that Mario Bava directed Caltiki, the Immortal Monster, not Riccardo Freda, who walked off the set and abandoned the film -- was shot down ("the answer is -- Riccardo Freda," Doug Winter sternly asserted) prompted an unexpectedly warm comment from Charlie as I stepped down from the stage. Baring one's teeth was a necessary rite-of-passage into Charlie's circle of respect, and the fact I followed through with evidence to back my contention long after Necon was over (thanks, Tim Lucas!) further endeared my stubborn Yankee streak to Charlie.

    In short order, my knowledge and great love for films Charlie loved -- Val Lewton's RKO gems, Jacques Tourneur's Curse/Night of the Demon, vintage 1930s and '40s horror, etc. -- led to some pleasant late-night Necon conversations amid the usual Necon hubbub. I recall particularly Charlie approaching me seeking a copy of a rare title he was seeking; I mailed it to him pronto upon my return home, earning a kind postcard and -- the following summer -- a wink and scowl followed by, "I don't care what Doug says about you, Steve, you seem to be an OK guy." (BTW, Doug and I quickly became good friends, too, so don't take this history the wrong way.)

    That attitude changed when I advocated comics and graphic novel writers being eligible for Bram Stoker Award nominations -- suddenly, I was back to interloper status, and damned interloper status at that. Charlie was vehemently against such nonsense, and was quickly in my face about this -- and I do mean in my face. He waved his finger at my nose and literally yelled, "It isn't a viable medium for writers! If you want this to go through, you'll have to prove it to me or push it over my dead body!" Charlie was formidable, to say the least, but I stood my ground -- and loaned him a set of Sandman (still only in its comics format, pre-graphic novel volumes) as evidence of my argument that there were, indeed, some top-notch writers mining the genre in the once-despised comics medium.

    A lesser man would have tossed them back unread; Charlie not only read them, he loved Sandman (thanks, Neil!), asked if I could find a set for him, and made a point of letting me know he had been wrong and I was right. Of course, that same Necon, he gladly turned the tables and boastfully asserted himself when he caught me in an error of fact during conversation -- "ah ha! Phah -- artists! What you don't know!" -- and we laughed, and thus, all was right with the world. Charlie was again on top, and I was in my place, and neither of us would have had it any other way.

    I haven't been at Necon for years, sadly, and lost contact with Charlie over the years, though I read his work forever thereafter (including the X-Files novels and every installment of the Shadows anthology I could find). My last couple of Necons included brief conversations with Charlie, but he was in poor health and often too exhausted to engage with the fire I so associated with my first impressions of him. (I won't belabor those last impressions; it's never fair to shade one's memories of a person's spirit with the toll the failing flesh takes upon said spirit.) Charlie was one of the greats I've been fortunate enough in this lifetime to meet, and he indeed encouraged my own pursuits as a writer.

    I've missed him for years; we'll all miss him forever, now.. save for his writing, which -- as Charlie always knew and said -- will outlive us all.
    _______________________



    The Last Broadcast DVD
    (w/Bissette art, Bissette/CCS team minicomic)
    Streets On Tuesday!

    This coming Tuesday, the two DVDs I've written about off and on all year (due to my own participation in each project, in very different ways) are streeting at last, both from the good folks at Heretic. (Both films are, appropriately enough, cinematic examples of the "quiet horror" approach Charlie so eloquently championed throughout his career.)

    First up is The Last Broadcast, for which I painted an expansive piece which appears as inside-cover art, suitable for framing/display, and worked with a dedicated team of Center for Cartoon Studies year one students on the bonus "Jersey Devil" mini-comic tucked inside with the DVD itself. Very cool package, all in all, and a nifty movie, too.



    As a favor to filmmakers and amigos Lance Weiler and Stefan Avalos, I also cobbled together three variations on possible back-cover text, which I'm posting for your amusement, below.

    Having worked as a video superstore buyer/manager for many years, I know how vital this aspect of the packaging can be -- who is the audience you're trying to attract to your film? How do you present your film?

    An essentially sui generis film like The Last Broadcast (a mockumentary-mystery that might be too bizarre for mystery fans, too tame for horror buffs) can be a difficult sell. One neither wishes to play up certain elements to misrepresent the film as an all-out horror pic, or undersell its unique merger of psychological dread and inventive storytelling. Furthermore, The Last Broadcast holds a special allure for young filmmakers who likely heard of the film via internet chatrooms, discussion boards or buzz -- though pitching that too strongly might alienate casual viewers just looking for a good night's entertainment -- and there's that pesky The Blair Witch Project bugaboo to deal with or ignore, which is both a key sales point and albatross (The Last Broadcast, completed over a year before Blair Witch, clearly provided the template for 1999's breakthrough sleeper horror hit, and the "innovative" Blair Witch online ballyhoo was whole-hog stolen from Stefan and Lance's Last Broadcast online promotion).

    Writing this kind of box copy is a fun challenge, and one I enjoyed. I'll leave it to you to find out which version Stefan, Lance and Heretic finally went with!
    ________________________

    Version #1:
    ________________________

    “***1/2 Creepy and Provocative...” - The Philadelphia Inquirer

    “**** ...creates an alternate universe
    in mind-boggling detail...” - New Jersey Star Ledger

    “...a slick thriller.” - Time Magazine

    “...a masterpiece.” - Punk Planet

    “Let’s not mince words: The Last Broadcast is The Jazz Singer
    of the digital era of feature filmmaking.” - SR Bissette

    On December 15th, 1995, a four-man team from the cable-access program “Fact or Fiction” braved the desolate New Jersey Pine Barrens, determined to deliver a live broadcast of the legendary monster The Jersey Devil.

    Only one came out alive...

    ...and that was only the beginning.

    The Last Broadcast is many things: an inventive internet-era mystery, an atmospheric horror film, a clever ‘mockumentary’ satirizing ‘Reality TV’ creators, parasites and sycophants. Often imitated but rarely seen (or bettered), The Last Broadcast presents itself as a documentary comprised of interviews and ‘found footage’ shot by those who were savagely murdered in the dead of night. The tangled web of psychic and psychotic behavior, backwoods menace, brutal death and buried secrets creates its own brand of spidery terror. And at the center of that web waits the horrific truth behind -- The Last Broadcast.

    Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler’s The Last Broadcast also made history as the first digitally-produced and satellite-broadcast theatrical feature in history. It has since earned cult stature as a pioneer in how 21st Century films are made and seen -- and as an eerie, innovative gem.

    This definitive DVD edition features:
    [see extras list with Version #3, final copy, below]

    _____________________

    Version #2:
    _____________________

    Ambition.
    Obsession.
    Madness.
    Damnation...
    ...and Death.

    And That’s Just the Beginning of --

    THE LAST BROADCAST.

    On December 15th, 1995, a four-man team from the cable-access program “Fact or Fiction” braved the desolate New Jersey Pine Barrens, determined to deliver a live broadcast of the legendary monster The Jersey Devil.

    Only one came out alive.

    It took the police two days to find the remains of two torn and battered bodies.

    The third was never found.

    It took the coroner four days to put the pieces back together.

    It took the jury 90 minutes to sentence the lone survivor to life in prison.

    One year later, filmmaker David Leigh decided to mount his own investigation. Convinced that the man convicted of these terrible crimes was innocent, Leigh proposes the murders were committed by someone -- or something -- else.
    Could the Jersey Devil still haunt the barrens?

    Often imitated (The Blair Witch Project debuted a year later) but rarely celebrated or seen, The Last Broadcast is many things: an inventive internet-era mystery, an atmospheric horror film, a clever ‘mockumentary’ satirizing ‘Reality TV’ creators, parasites and sycophants. It unreels as a documentary comprised of interviews and ‘found footage’ shot by those who were savagely murdered in the dead of night.

    The tangled web of psychic and psychotic behavior, backwoods menace, brutal death and buried secrets creates its own brand of spidery terror. And at the center of that blood-spattered web lurks the horrific truth behind -- The Last Broadcast.

    This definitive special edition of the chilling classic features:

    [see extras list, below]

    “Incredibly creepy. Don’t see it alone.
    And if you do, don’t go to bed alone...” - The Vanguard

    “**** ...creates an alternate universe
    in mind-boggling detail...” - New Jersey Star Ledger

    “The story is well told... it’s terrific!” - Fox TV

    “...a masterpiece.” - Punk Planet
    __________________

    Version #3:
    ___________________

    “Let’s not mince words: The Last Broadcast is The Jazz Singer of the digital era of feature filmmaking.” - SR Bissette

    From the makers of Head Trauma and The Ghosts of Edendale -- the ‘shockumentary’ that launched the New Millennium of filmmaking!

    The Last Broadcast is many things: a mystery film, a horror movie, an inventive and often-imitated ‘mockumentary’ -- and the first digitally-produced and satellite-broadcast theatrical feature in history. It has since earned cult stature as a pioneer in how 21st Century films are made and seen -- and as a seminal 1990s ‘sleeper’, must-viewing for all who love cinema and a healthy chill.

    One year after a horrific multiple murder in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, filmmaker David Leigh (David Beard) mounts his own documentary investigation of “psychic” Jim Suerd (Jim Seward), serving life in prison for the murder of a three-man amateur cable “news team” (played by Rein Clabbers and The Last Broadcast co-directors Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler) he led in search of the legendary “Jersey Devil.” Leigh believes someone -- or something -- else was behind the brutal deaths.
    What is the horrifying secret of The Last Broadcast?

    Building on the bedrock of Ruggero Deodato’s notorious Cannibal Holocaust (1981) and genuine documentaries like Paradise Lost (1996), The Last Broadcast probes the psychopathology of “reality TV.” But The Last Broadcast delivers its horrors without spilling entrails, anticipating the subtler suggestive horrors popularized by The Sixth Sense and Japanese ‘J-horror’ ghost films. As in their subsequent solo features -- Stefan Avalos’s The Ghosts of Edendale (2005) and Lance Weiler’s Head Trauma (2006, also available from Heretic) -- they create goosebumps by exploring the dark corners where the real monsters dwell.

    This definitive special edition of the chilling classic features:
    [see list of extras, below]
    __

    “***1/2 Creepy and Provocative...” - The Philadelphia Inquirer

    “...May have influenced Blair Witch -- it certainly preceded it.” - Indie Wire

    “**** ...creates an alternate universe in mind-boggling detail...” - New Jersey Star Ledger

    “...a masterpiece.” - Punk Planet
    ___________

    For box art:

    This definitive DVD edition features:

    * Remastered Picture and Sound
    * Two audio commentary tracks with co-creators Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler
    * English and Spanish Subtitles (Feature only)
    * Behind the scenes docs on Production, Post-Production and Distribution
    * 12-pg. booklet including color mini-comic “Jersey Devil” by Stephen R. Bissette (co-creator of Constantine) and The Center for Cartoon Studies; Jersey Devil sightings map; bios; liner notes; more!
    * Exclusive Interviews
    * "Fact or Fiction!" rare clips from the infamous public access cable show.
    * Jim Seward - Alive and Well (2 folk songs)
    * Trailers for The Last Broadcast, Ghosts of Edendale and Head Trauma
    * "Gallery of Gore"- Pine Barrens murder crime scene & autopsy images, The Last Broadcast poster and box art from around the world!

    For booklet:

    * Remastered Picture and Soundtrack
    * Two audio commentary tracks with co-creators Stefan Avalos and Lance Weiler (1999 and 2006)
    * English and Spanish Subtitles (for the Main Feature only)
    * Behind the scenes documentary featurettes on Production, Post-Production and Distribution
    * 12-pg. booklet including color mini-comic “Jersey Devil” by Stephen R. Bissette (co-creator of Constantine) and artists and writers from The Center for Cartoon Studies; Jersey Devil sightings map; filmmaker portraits & biographies; liner notes; more!
    * Raw Interviews - Improv before the edit
    * "Fact or Fiction!" - rare clips from the infamous public access cable show!
    * Jim Seward - Alive and Well (performing two folk songs)
    * Trailers for The Last Broadcast, Stefan Avalos’s Ghosts of Edendale and Lance Weiler’s Head Trauma
    * "Gallery of Gore"- original Pine Barrens murder crime scene & autopsy images, The Last Broadcast poster and box art from around the world!

    Thursday, September 21, 2006


    Ally-Oop! CCS Week Two and the Quest for the Early Graphic Novels...





    (pictured: art by William Gropper, Ally-Oop!, 1931)

    Morning, all. Just a quickie; may post more later today. Had a busy, productive two days teaching at CCS, including a heady drawing workshop with the freshman class that yielded some great work. We ran with an exercise in character/critter design I've successfully applied in the past, but this freshmen group ran with the sucker beyond any prior experience -- yielding complete character design sheets, which allowed us to then swap those around to have others work from those sheets (myself included; I do most of the drawing exercises myself, too) and we still had time to post the results and savor a half-hour critique session, with the designers reviewing the art completed from their character design. Great session, very energizing!

    Now I'm back home and looking forward to staying put a few days. Still, much to do: today, I'm diving into continuing the excavation/organization of my massive shithea -- ah, collection and library. This also allows me to expand & revise my comics history class ("Survey of the Drawn Story") for the CCS freshmen, which is an ongoing undertaking. Everyone gets the best of what I've got in hand come lecture day, but each and every lecture gets a thorough going-over afterwards and is revised to improve the next presentation of the material, including adding scans, titles, artists, etc.

    In doing so, I'm also pulling together all I can on the precursors to the graphic novel as we know it today. I've got quite a collection of these seminal books, but I'm always delighted when folks turn me on to works I've never heard of. This still-amorphous body of work is still essentially unnamed -- "pantomime novel," "wordless woodcut novel," etc. have been flown up the flagpole, but no one salutes -- but it's clearly a major aspect of comics history long overdue proper attention.

    James Sturm turned me on some time ago to the delightful Ally-Oop by William Gropper (1930), and I'm happy to know James has already written the intro for a reprint edition being prepared by Drawn & Quarterly for 2007 -- one of a number of such D&Q projects that will go a long way toward rectifying the situation.

    Could some of the best graphic novels of 2007 end up being over 75 years old? Time will tell, if it hasn't already.

    Ah, I'm rambling. More later...

    Monday, September 18, 2006

    Where We Were This Weekend...



    ...Wish You Were Here.




    (Actually, I Wish We Were Still Here!)

    It was a great weekend.
    Have a great Tuesday & Wednesday, all -- I'm off teaching at CCS...
    see you here on Thursday morning!

    [Photos (c) 2006 Marjory Bissette; thanks, sweetie!]

    Midday Update --

    Sad news:

    Horror writer Charles Grant passed away this weekend.

    The horror boards are buzzing, and I may have more news to share later this week, but this is a sad day for all who read and most of all those who knew and loved Charlie. He was a writer's writer, a passionate and articulate advocate for the art and a formidable presence in the genre, and he will be sorely missed.

    I have my own Charlie Grant stories to share, from my active years with the Horror Writers Association (then Horror Writers of America), but today's not the day to do so... I'm honored to have known the man at all, and feel blessed to have had some chats, laughs and head-butting with Charles off and on in the late '80s and early '90s.

    R.I.P., Charlie.
    __________

    Good news:

    Me old amigo Phil Nutman just emailed me this weekend from a-way down south in Georgia to alert me to his latest installment of the online media journal Up Against the Wall, now in its 2nd 'issue' at www.upagainstthewallmag.com

    The latest installment features Phil's interview with Psychedelic Furs front man Richard Butler, whose new Sentimental Airlines is (in Phil's opinion) "one of the best CDs of the year." Also: Al Kaufman's interview with Daren Wang of Verb, who wants to change the way you think about literary magazines, and Al's chat with musician Dan Bern on the heels of Bern's anti-Bush campaign; and more, including music reviews (Arctic Monkeys, Mott the Hoople, Goldfrapp, and made-in-VT movie Disappearances star Kris Kristofferson) and lots of movie stuff. There's Phil getting all weepy over the new Lassie movie and DVD reviews of my fave '70s biker opus The Losers, the shaggy-dog-biker-bastard offspring Werewolves on Wheels, Jim Van Bebber's stunning The Manson Family, that beloved Richard Matheson/Dan Curtis made-for-TV chestnut Trilogy of Terror, women-in-prison depravities Bare Behind Bars and Amazon Jail, MVD's Pornstar Pets (guest-reviewed by Justin Griffin) and -- for more wholesome appetites -- BBC America's uncut DVD set of the Christopher Eccelson season of Dr. Who (reviewed by Shawn Carter).

    Great reading, leading to good reading/listening/viewing, all!

    And what the hell, while you're at it, you should also check out Phil's website at
    www.PhilipNutman.com

    Monday Morning Shake

    Easing into the week after a marvelous weekend, and tackling prep for the intensive second week of the new semester at the Center for Cartoon Studies.

    I'll be posting off-and-on in the next 24 hours, and be offline until Thursday AM -- which is likely to be my weekly rhythm hereafter, giving my CCS teaching schedule.

    So, from now on this blog will offer rare Tuesday AM posts, and I'm unlikely to ever be posting Wednesday, but I'll be here as often as I can be the rest of the time.
    _________________

    Among the prep duties of the day is the pleasant "task" of reading a short story by Ross Wood Studlar, the CCS senior I'm working with one-on-one (as his thesis advisor). This story may prove to be the springboard for Ross's thesis project -- we'll see, that's up to Ross! -- but it's a great beginning of the process, and I'm feeling good overall about the coming year.

    Last week, the incoming CCS freshmen students completed their first collective comic as part of our first drawing workshop session -- yes, already, a new comic!

    Hi-Octane High Emotion may never command the covetous attention of the comic-buying masses, but it emerged from a lively roundtable drawing exercise of my invention, gave us all a way to sample what we're capable of, and yielded at least a few corkers and one gem of a one-pager I can't stop laughing at.

    OK, more later today --

    Thursday, September 14, 2006

    Back in the Saddle Again...

    ...but just for a few moments.

    Ah, a busy week, indeed!

    First week of the new semester at the Center for Cartoon Studies kicked off in style, but it's been a maddening pace, what with CCS duties, a new student body to meet and greet, and Lance & Jennifer Weiler up for appearances at the penultimate Latchis Theater showing of Head Trauma and a visit (and screening) at CCS.

    All went well, with the dividend of seeing my grown-up kids Dan and Maia at the Latchis screening, too. Hugs and posters all around (Lance graciously gifted 'em both with signed one-sheets from his movie).

    I'll write about it all on Monday, once I'm able to clear enough time to catch up. Or maybe I'll write about sumpin' else. Who knows.

    However, I must alert you to the new book from vet Vermont cartoonist extraordinaire Jeff Danziger, who made his mark hereabouts in the '70s and '80s with his comic strip In The Sticks (which ran in the Barre VT paper The Times Argus and, I believe, The Rutland Herald).

    Jeff broke new ground in regional comic strips, and then went on to write and draw books like The Champlain Monster and extend the adventures of the backwoods Teed family of In The Sticks via occasional short stories for the Rutland Herald (collected in book form a few years back as, natch, Teed Stories).



    He's also become one of the best of the current generation of editorial cartoonists, sharpening his pen nibs and quick wit on the contemporary political -- state, federal, domestic and global -- arena, and for that I only love 'im more.

    So, what are you waiting for? Get your mitts on your own copy of Blood, Debt & Fears and acquaint yourself with Jeff's latest collection of work.

    It's worth the effort, and a niche on your shelves.



    Due to time constraints, I'll be offline until Monday morning.

    I'll see you here then, and sorry to drop out of sight again after a pretty good run of daily posts.

    I'll keep on task once the current workload lifts. Have a great weekend...

    Tuesday, September 12, 2006

    The Black Pit of Dr. M

    Ah, off to CCS for day one of the new semester!

    I'll try to post later this week -- for now, let me steer you to my current fave DVD new releases you likely didn't know existed, the
  • CasaNegra Entertainment Mexican horror classics series.
  • As a long-time devotee of these gems, previously relegated to late-night TV obscurity (in my teen years) and public-domain vhs and DVD limbo (save for Mike Vraney and Something Weird Video's brief stab at legally releasing 'em), I'm loving everything CasaNegra has thus far released.

    I've already viewed their debut offerings, Curse of the Crying Woman and The Witch's Mirror, which were revelations. This past week, I savored the one-two punch of The Black Pit of Dr. M -- previously seen only during my junior high school years in its dubbed format on a fuzzy, commercial-riddled late-night TV broadcast -- and (at last!) the crispest, loveliest print ever seen of The Brainiac, and in its original Mexican language (English subtitled, natch).

    Black Pit of Dr. M was a real treat, touching on greatness at times while evoking a genuinely uncanny atmosphere amid the ghostly visitations and now-expected Grand Guignol flourishes (a rampaging madwomen on the loose, acid-in-the-face deformation, malingering knives foreshadowing inevitable bloody stabbings, hanging, resurrection from the grave, torched madmen, etc.). At one point, the delirium approaches deliciously Jungian waters, with a heroine haunted by escalating encounters and intimacy with a man previously seen only in her dreams (as if she didn't have enough else haunting her in this opus), and a line of dialogue evocative of (no shit) Maya Deren's Meshes of the Afternoon, linking "a key, a knife and a woman" as the iconic centerpieces of this gem -- and indeed, they are.

    But, hey, there's also the acid-scarred killer (who is eventually resurrected from the grave as a host for the displaced soul of an executed man) to cheer for, culminating in a pretty spectacular fiery finale (including a stunt more vivid than any I'd seen in any previous horror film of this vintage, anticipating the kind of fiery boogeyman-deaths characteristic of '80s slasher pix). I loved every ravishing, maddening second of it, and am aching for more.

    Amigo Tim Lucas has much more to say about Dr. M
  • on his August 28th Video Watchblog, so check it out.


  • Of course, I don't want to short-shrift The Brainiac, but there just isn't time this morning to rhapsodize as I must, as I will, about this most delirious of all MexiMonster epics. More later, but don't drag your feet -- get your mitts on these pix while you can! These films have a long history of surfacing and just as quickly disappearing, and no one has done them justice the way CasaNegra has.

    The Black Pit of President B

    Hey, thanks for the "non-political speech," President Bush. It was a real peach. 17 minutes of K-Tel retreads of your greatest hits.

    Our Prez Speaks: It's how long?

    You didn't talk about 9/11, really. You hardly mentioned Afghanistan or Osama Bin Laden -- oh, wait, you didn't mention them.

    Truth to tell, it's awfully hard to put an ounce of credibility into your claims that you'll "protect us," with New Orleans and much of Katrina's wake in four states still looking like it did last year at this time, with New Orleans still starving for electricity, water and medical aid (like, uh, Iraq), and Ground Zero still a hole in the ground. Your protection and rebuilding efforts speak for themselves.

    And as for the 21st Century Domino Theory you're huckstering, sorry, but it didn't wash in the '60s and '70s, and all you've done by taking the war to Baghdad is breed tens of thousands of new extremists who hate America. "Whatever mistakes have been made in Iraq, the worst mistake would be to think that if we pulled out, the terrorists would leave us alone," you said last night. "They will not leave us alone. They will follow us. The safety of America depends on the outcome of the battle in the streets of Baghdad." You jeopardized the safety of America the second you declared war on a nation that was no threat to us, and what happens daily on the streets of Baghdad is a greater threat to us than anything that existed on the streets of Baghdad before you and yours began the "shock and awe" campaign of terror.

    You're still selling your goddamned war. You willfully fomented the Iraq War out of nothing -- well, nothing you'll 'fess up to, really.

    We've heard all your reasons, over and over and over again, and your no-choice options (stay or run). We heard all your justifications, including fantasies of "mushroom clouds," and still nothing holds water. IEDs and suicide bombers are the weapons of mass destruction we face; you arrogantly refuted "swatting at flies," and still the "flies" come daily. You've killed 10-times-over the number of Iraqi citizens -- innocent lives -- above and beyond the body count of innocent Americans killed on 9/11, and almost matched the 9/11 and US military body count (not counting, of course, the tens of thousands maimed, wounded and traumatized, or the contractor deaths; the uncounted blood toll of this war).

    You said, "We are in a war that will set the course for this new century and determine the destiny of millions across the world."

    9/11 did not start this war, however often you link the two.

    You started this war.

    What was it, really?

    Was it a pre-defined US/Middle East agenda of Messiahnic conquest, imagined & projected fears, hatred for a personal enemy-at-large who was previously an ally, to avenge Saddam's assassination attempt on your Mom and Pop?

    Maybe you'll share that one day with us.

    That would be nice to hear.

  • Instead of more of this.
  • Monday, September 11, 2006

    Five Years Later... Here We Are.

    You know the routine.

    Overload, overdose, memories.

    All twisted to justify the madness of the past five years -- which had nothing to do with 9/11, save the excuse it gave for this President and Administration to impose their new world order.

    They pretend it's all cause-and-effect, though there is no logic at work:

    Saudis with boxcutters -- still the reality of 9/11 -- though Saudi Arabia remains our ally, boxcutters are not banned, Osama Bin Laden is still at large and the Iraq War has only served his goals (heck, he's celebrating the anniversary with his own home videos).

    Whatever logic was at work to lead us into war in Afghanistan was inverted and perverted once war was launched against Iraq. The Iraq War has nothing to do with 9/11, as President Bush himself brashly asserted as a curt retort in the summer's final press conference -- and yet, here we are, 9/11/06, with the same on-task on-message 9/11 links and rhetoric and claims being hammered.

    The kid gloves were never on -- now, even active denial is a thing of the past. Within one week, we've heard/seen our President and Vice-President actively advocate and campaign for, via speeches and personal appearances, the new American obligation and right to practice illegal seizure, interminable imprisonment, and torture. Guilty until proven guilty is their new reality, sans the "proof" (sorry, state secrets!). Vice-President Cheney openly talks about the "dark side" on television this week, with that pragmatic boardroom shark bravado of his, having successfully plunged us all into the dark side while claiming time and time again no, it was 9/11 that put us here.

    It was bad in the early '70s, with Nixon & Agnew in power and Vietnam ripping Southeast Asia and our country into shreds -- but at least Nixon & Agnew and the Pentagon were publicly denying atrocities, abuse, torture.

    We're so past that -- we are worse, so much worse. Bush & Cheney aren't just condoning torture, they are relishing its justification, bragging of its efficacy, daring anyone to stop them.

    They have made terrorists of us all, wrapped in pious righteousness and our bloodied flag.

    Welcome to 9/11, five years later.
    ______________

    Re: Path to 9/11. Hey, Mark, I wasn't calling for anything to be denied us. Hell, I'm dying to see the complete miniseries -- as it was originally edited, prior to last week's reported last-minute panic "corrective" edits, with every twisted anti-Clinton factoid and invented conceit.

    Since the days of goona-goona films, mondo movies, "based on a true story" exposes, hate films and horror pix (Texas Chainsaw Massacre, anyone?), the ol' "based on a true story" exploitation spin has been part & parcel of ballyhoo. TV movies have been spinning heavily-fabricated docudramas based on true crime and sensational news for over four decades -- but not during election seasons, as part of government-sanctioned campaigns against opposing parties.

    Was Path to 9/11 any different, really? To my mind, no -- as a movie -- but the promotion of the series was presenting it as fact, with nothing in the print ads (the flag torn by a hand, a pair of eyes peering out from the tear) indicating the film was anything but a documentary, and its timing amid an election season tilted the scales.

    Disney & ABC were presenting a politically-charged exploitation film, promoting is as a documentary, on the fifth anniversary of 9/11 in an election year amid a carefully-planned GOP campaign to forcefeed the US another heapin' helping of pro-War, pro-torture jingoism.

    ABC's planned broadcast of the six-hour opus on this weekend, promoted as fact, was something I thought worth speaking out against. The broadcast, not the film, was the issue for me.

    (Do I champion the right of Path to 9/11's makers to make it and for it to be seen? Yes. Do I support Ruggero Deodato's right to make Cannibal Holocaust? Sure. Do I want to see it? Damn, I own three copies, Mark, three different edits. Bring on all that stuff, political and apolitical: Birth of a Nation, Ingagi, The Eternal Jew, Triumph of the Will, Child Bride, We Will Bury You, Red Dawn, Men Behind the Sun, etc.. Should it be presented as factual and shown on prime-time NBC, sanctioned by network stations, or serialized on the Disney Channel between The Suite Life of Zach and Cody and That's So Raven? Fuck, no.)

    Hell, the filmmakers' work isn't going to be denied venues. Path to 9/11 will be everywhere -- and would have been -- whether it was broadcast on ABC or not this past weekend. The Reagans was the model: that film was pulled from its network slot and later shown on cable, it was and is available on video and DVD -- as will be The Book of Daniel, the TV series that so pissed off the religious right, in a couple of weeks (streets 9/26) -- and so will be Path to 9/11. Personally, I'm as eager to see it (uncut and complete, please) as I was The Reagans and ABC's Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America TV movie (streeting on DVD on Halloween, appropriately enough -- booga, booga!).

    I wasn't calling for a filmmaker's work to be censored, I was calling a spade a spade: corporate Disney/ABC publicizing propaganda docudrama "as fact," which is what their ads were doing until the backpedalling of the end of last week. By all reports, there was considerable deviation from the actual 9/11 Commission report source material, with a partisan spin in place; it was a docudrama with an agenda (most of them have one, nature of the beast). I didn't call for it to be cut or censored, I called for the 9/11-timed broadcast to be reconsidered, and for Disney/ABC to 'fess up to their corporate partisanship.

    You want to talk, let's talk.
    ___________

    Have a great 9/11, folks.

    Sunday, September 10, 2006

    And in the Real World...

    The bit of time I spend each day on this exercise (which is what it is to me: flexing mental muscles for real work) presents such a distorted view of life, my life and that of my life with Marge and here in Marlboro, that it seemed appropo today to touch on what is, after all, reality.

    I consciously avoid getting into family matters, save for the occasional note on what Dan or Maia might be up to, in venues some of you might be able to access (hence, my noting Dan's DJ debut, his work on Head Trauma; once Maia is sharing more with me on what she's up to, or mounts another gallery show, I'll post that here, too). Marge is a school psychologist, and though we talk daily about aspects of her work and life therein, it's not suitable for airing publicly, period.

    So, most of my life, per se, isn't reflected here ... by and large, it's nobody's business in the blogosphere, so I leave it at that.

    Only occasionally do I get into something momentous in Marge's and my life, or my life with CCS and the community that's become so vital to me that's there -- again, usually when it's in a form you might be able to access, which brings us back to the bigger media pool, and blah blah blah.

    Though I type about this media and that here -- media being the touchstone of common shared experience, or potential shared experiences in the 21st Century -- day-to-day life is composed of quieter things, and the most real of all are the occasional moments when our artifice is abandoned or falls away long enough to allow for crossing paths with the countless beings living around and with us.

    I mean, like, there's our cats, Lizzie and Tuco, who most of you met the day I posted the intro to them here, with photo. But we really share this block of ground with a variety of animal and vegetable life, and that's part of the day-to-day I savor. For instance, here's a few snapshots from this month that come to mind:

    **********

    * In mid August, in broad daylight, two almost-'teen' white-tail deer fawns picked their way up the hill behind our home, gingerly approaching the few berry bushes remaining on the upper edge of the hill, where our 'lawn' begins.

    Both were quite adult in stature, but still had their spots -- hence my 'teen' reference, an anthropomorphism that at least conveys some aspect of their age most of you can dig -- and they were moving with the tentative steps betraying their still-fawn, not-yet-adult confidence in moving on their own as a team, only occasionally hinting at their pending maturity with a step, a look, and graceful arching of the neck to nibble at something or other at the edge of the yard.

    I watched them for almost ten minutes, enchanted with the privileged view of their lives, so much a part of where we live, too, but for the most part invisible to us.

    (I'll add and emphasize I was completely invisible to them, too, as this point. I made no motion or sound, and the surprise that followed had nothing to do with one or the other seeing/hearing me.)

    The braver of the two was leading, the other following a good fifteen to twenty feet behind. This was fine until the bolder of the two crested the unmowed portion of our yard and made his/her (I couldn't determine gender at this stage of their growth) up and around the edge of a sizable boulder, probing and occasionally nibbling at the few remaining berries.

    Now, at the moment he/she was out of line of sight of the other, the fawn following grew visibly tense: his/her body stiffened, movements became more wary and fragmented, as if something ominous were about to happen. The leader, of course, was unconscious of this change in behavior: he/she was intent on browsing and foraging.

    As he came around the edge of the boulder, the following fawn caught a glimpse of the leader in the new location -- and clearly, a total disconnect had occured: once the leader had moved out of the field of sight, had seemed to disappear, the reappearance of the lead fawn from a new location seemed to indicate a "new deer" was interloping.

    The follower fawn bolted erect in surprise, flagged her tail, and made an odd sound -- a sort of cough of alarm.

    The lead fawn, evidently not confused at all as to who this alarmed fawn might be -- he/she had never lost track of the fact the follower fawn was still his/her brother/sister -- reacted to the follower fawn's confusion and sudden sounding/flashing of the alarm as he should: "Oh, shit, something's wrong/coming!" His body language suddenly changed, too, and he flagged with his tail and looked around, attentive in a new way entirely to his immediate surroundings.

    Seeing his/her lead partner thus alarmed, the follower fawn grew more alarmed and suddenly bolted -- away from bro/sis fawn, as if he/she were the intruder to be fled from.

    In response, the lead fawn also sprang from his position, also away from his/her partner fawn, and off the bound into opposite directions.

    I laughed out loud. This was pretty antic stuff, if you stuck with it.

    [An aside: A couple of days later, at a used bookstore in White River Jct., The Hundredth Monkey, the shop's glass-cabinet of pricey rarer used books caught my eye: there was a copy of one of the first, long-out-0f-print paperback edition of Larry Benoit's first book on deer hunting! These are rare tomes, much coveted by hunters and collectors, and of interest to me because the Benoits live in Duxbury, VT, where I grew up; I in fact was classmate from 1st grade to graduation with Lane Benoit. Just an odd coincidence, the spectacle of the two fawns and the discovery of the rare Benoit book a little later...)

    *******************

    * You may recall, if you're a frequent reader of this blather, I wrote one morn about finding one of our two apple trees ravaged, apparently by a bear. I still think it's a bear, and it's been back to climb and do some damage to the smaller of our two trees. We still haven't seen him, though our neighbors have on their property.

    ********************

    * There's a couple of chipmunks living in and under our garage, and though thus far they haven't damaged any of the stuff I've got stored on the second floor (the entire SpiderBaby backstock of Tyrant, Taboo, SpiderBaby Comix, etc.), they are now busy stashing nuts, seeds and such in nooks and crannies I'm stumbling upon while trying to get the shitheap in order before winter hits.

    The mice, on the other hands, have done some damage, including destroying absolutely the last stash of Michael Zulli/Neil Gaiman Sweeney Todd color posters I had; damn it, the box ended up on its side at some point, and the little fuckers moved in, treating the rolled posters like an apartment complex. They nibbled, shit and pissed Sweeney into oblivion, and I had to toss the entire stash. Sigh.

    Soon, they'll be making their way into the house; it's inevitable every fall as the cold nights assert the rodent exodus to warmer shelter. Of course, this year we have Lizzie and Tuco to tender the mice transition from this earthly realm to rodent heaven or hell (and I've no doubt our cats will make that transition as hellish as only cats can), but I spent about fifteen minutes this morning setting traps on the basement studio/office level, where the cats are verboten.

    *********************

    * With the rains and warm weather of this week, the amphibians -- primarily frogs and toads, though I've seen two newts, too -- are making their way to and from whereever it is they make their way to and from at summer's end. We've had some spectacular wood frogs (I mean, surprisingly massive fellows, though all are lean and spry) pop into view this past week, and while moving the last of the wood debris from my back yard to the lower-acre bonfire site (for winter burning, once the snow is deep), I turned up a corn snake that had recently shed its skin. I usually keep these skins, but this one was tattered and fragile, crumbling at the touch. The snake, though, was glistening and lively as can be.

    The toads were out in force last night. As I walked between the back door of our house to the garage around 8:30 PM last night (en route to my car: I had to give an intro for Head Trauma at the Latchis in Brattleboro, ten miles away), having just put on the outside lights I'd inadvertantly scattered a number of palm-sized toads, who were hopping over our stone path. One, intent only on getting away from big ol' me, bound toward the garage door. Not wanting the little fellow to end up trapped in the garage, I picked him up and carefully set him off to the side of our stone path. He immediately leapt, in six concentreated bursts, to the garage foundation and snuggled himself in as tight as he could between boards and the mossy ground, hiding.

    ***********************

    * After doing my stint at the Latchis, I decided to drive up to First Run Video on Putney Road for my media fix. After doing so, and chatting with Robin, Dave and everyone there, I headed home, but instead of heading north out of the driveway turned south on 5, wanting to drive through Brattleboro one more time just to vary the route.

    It was still raining lightly, and at the stoplight by the entrance to the Staples plaza, I slowed down and noticed two things in the darkness:

    A slightly tubby teenage boy standing over by the plaza entrance, wearing a baseball hat, was just standing and staring, strangely intent upon something in the road; then I noticed there was an absolutely huge green frog making its way across the street. It looked like it would take two hands to pick up this fellow!

    The frog leaped, sat, leaped, oblivious to the traffic, but somehow crossing precisely at the stoplight.

    As the light changed, I swerved slightly to avoid hitting the frog.

    The boy grinned. I waved and looked behind, in my rearview mirror: more vehicles were coming.

    I've no idea if the frog made it or not, but I'm sure that kid stuck around for the show.

    ************************

    * On the way home, on Route 9, the rain-slicked tarmac was littered with early fall leaves and a few branches. And amid all that clutter, more frogs and toads.

    Some were still hopping, on their quest from whereever to whereever, all seemingly facing north; others were mere lumps and smears, already flattened by tires.

    I picked my way home between them as best I could without swerving. By the time you could a glimpse of something recognizably amphibian-like in the headlights, it was too late to do anything but hope you missed 'em.

    **************************

    * After pulling into the driveway, the garage, and parking my car, I closed the garage door and heard something -- well, weird.

    Stepping out the garage back door to walk back to our house, I heard it again, coming from the woods behind our house: an absolutely demonic wailing, sounding for all the world like a howler monkey, finally giving way to short bursts and recognizably owl-like hoots.

    Immediately, another owl, audibly a bit further away, replied, echoing the pattern of howls, interrupted suddenly by the owl closer to where I stood, who amplified his shrieks to an alarming degree. Cool!

    I stood and listened until the last call faded, stood still. Nothing. I quietly made my way to the back door, and went inside.

    Marge was upstairs in bed already; the light on my side of the bed was still on, all of our bedroom windows were open, and Marge was laying down completely, not reading or anything, but clearly awake and a bit perturbed.

    "You OK?" I asked.

    "Ya, I've been listening to the show. Did you hear that racket? What was that?"

    "Owls," I snickered, "just owls. Have they been at it long?"

    "Jesus, yes -- they've been at it for over half-an-hour..."

    "Sorry I missed the show."

    And I was sorry, too. I love listening to 'em when they get going.

    **********************

    Later, around one this morning, I awakened by another owl, way in the distance north of our digs, hooting in the woods. There was no exchange, no cacophony, just the lone bird, sounding.

    I closed my eyes and went back to sleep. I dreamed, but not of owls, or frogs, or mice or chipmunks or white-tail deer.
    ______________________

    So, that's reality, folks -- not what I usually write about here. Just keeping some perspective, lest you think the jabber I post here is the be-all and end-all, which it sure isn't by a long shot.

    Have a great Sunday, one and all. It's the first week of CCS's new semester, and my workload is pretty intensive, so I've no idea how often or if I'll be able to post this week.

    We'll take it as it comes... as ever.

    Saturday, September 09, 2006

    The First CCS Documentary! & Saturday Updates

    Amid CCS prep work, musing yet another proposed 1963 collected edition overture (I'll say nothing more!), and ongoing script-writing sessions on a top-secret project, I snagged a bit of time and screened this summer's Dartmouth College documentary film class's Center for Cartoon Studies overview, Drawing in the Margins (2006, 11 minutes).

    Alexander Opoku-Agyemang, Tatyana Liskovich
    and Terry Berry were the filmmakers, under their moniker Second Wind Productions, and they did a pretty fine job of it! I'm among the interview subjects, along with CCS co-founder and Grand Divine She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed Omnipotent Stomper Michelle Ollie, Dartmouth faculty member and CCS booster Ana Mareno (who is fantastic: "White River Junction is a town full of ghosts, and CCS is full of ghosts..."), cartoonist extraordinaire Rich Tommaso, and students Josie Whitmore, Jon-Mikel Gates, Colleen Frakes and others.

    The film gives a multi-faceted & painfully honest snapshot of CCS's home base White River Junction as well, and is very cleverly constructed around the various definitions of the word 'junction' and ingenious, never-cloying use of various comics graphic devices (panels, word balloons, captions, etc.) and iconography. The final credits sport the complete rendition by James Kochalka of his now-beloved "CCS Fight Song," which indeed makes one's heart swell with pride.

    Kudos to Alexander, Tatyana & Terry, and we thank and salute you!
    ________________________

    Head Trauma is screening at the Latchis Theater in Brattleboro only at 9 PM tonight; there is no 7 PM show. I'll be there to give the intro, and then home I go. Sunday thru Thursday, it is screening at 7 and 9 PM.
    _________________________

    More later, we gotta hit the road. Have a great Saturday, hope to see some of you tonight at Head Trauma...

    Friday, September 08, 2006

    Horrific Head Trauma's Here,
    Disney/ABC's Path to 9/11 Dangerous?,
    [Note: I've added a 1 PM update on Path to 9/11]
    Moore Fans: Check Out Kinky Boots
    !
    ___________

    Head Trauma Opens at the Latchis in Brattleboro Tonite --
    I'll Be There, Will You?




    I've been posting about Lance Weiler's new feature Head Trauma all week, and just want to remind everyone in driving distance of Brattleboro, VT's famous Latchis Theater that I'll be at tonight and tomorrow night (Sept. 8 & 9th)'s opening-weekend showings of Head Trauma -- so be there if you can!

    I'll be introducing and fielding Q&A for the first show at 7 PM, and just introducing the 9 PM shows both nights. As amply covered here already (if you're just popping in, read the earlier posts from this past week, below), my son Dan and I drew one of the two comics narratives integral to Head Trauma's creepy psychological chills; I'll be posting more info on the creative process, with stages of the artwork we created, here next week.

    Remember, too, that Lance will be attending the Wednesday, September 13th showings at the Latchis, and he and his wife (and yours truly) will be buzzing up I-91 to The Center for Cartoon Studies in White River Jct. for a special afternoon session with the CCS students, and a one-show-only evening presentation of Head Trauma on Sept. 14th at 7 PM at the CCS, in the Colodny Building. Seating is limited for that event; first come, first seated, no reservations.

    They'll then be heading for Rutland for the Friday, September 15th show in that VT city -- I'll not be attending that event.

    If you live too far away to attend, no worries: Head Trauma streets on DVD on September 26th, featuring mucho extras, including a bonus feature in which Dan and I discuss the creation of our portion of the film's original comic art.
    ____________________________________

    Dan will be at the Latchis both nights for the film's intro -- and I want to acknowledge and celebrate here the fact that my son Dan also DJed his first-ever radio program last night, "Music for Nervous People," on Brattleboro's brand-new low-watt local microradio station (WVEW, 107.7 FM).

    Sadly, the station signal doesn't reach Marlboro, where I live, and according to station honcho Larry Block it's not yet online, so I couldn't tune in and I can't tune you in -- but I did want to be sure to bring Dan's radio debut to your attention, and wish him luck! He tells me there's at least one more program coming up, but beyond that -- well, we'll see.

    For more on Brattleboro's new community radio station WVEW, click
  • here,
  • though note that WVEW does have its own site --
  • here
  • -- which is mislisted on Google as "www.wvew.com" instead of "www.wvew.org" -- make a note of that!

    WVEW arose from the ashes of the original community microradio station rfb (Radio Free Brattleboro); for more info on the original rfb, check
  • here, which features an update chronology of rfb's lifespan.

  • __________________________________________

    Alan Moore and Leah Moore/John Reppion fans, take note: the recent DVD release of Julian Jarrold's "based-on-a-true-story" opus Kinky Boots is worth a look for the glimpses it provides of Alan & Leah's own home town of Northampton, UK.

    When Marge and I caught up with Leah & John in Copenhagen back in April, Leah indeed confirmed that Kinky Boots had been filmed in Northampton, and was indeed based on an honest-to-God true story, which is all I needed to hear. Though we missed seeing the film on its brief threatrical run hereabouts, we're eager to catch it on DVD. Having visited Northampton at least three times back in the '80s and early '90s, I'm eager to see how Alan & Leah's native digs come across on celluloid. Clearly modeled on the international popularity of recent breakthrough hits like The Full Monty and Calender Girls (whose co-writer, Tim Firth, indeed co-scripted Kinky Boots).

    If nothing else, if there's enough of Northampton on view, I'll snap up my own copy of Kinky Boots to rack it alongside From Hell, V for Vendetta and -- my beloved rare vhs copy of John Candy/Eugene Levy/John Blanchard's The Last Polka (1985), in which Candy & Levy appear as Yosh & Stan Shmenge (and Pa & Ma Shmenge).

    Uh, why rack the classic Shmenge faux-biopic alongside Kinky Boots? Because one of my fave sequences of The Last Polka chronicles the Shmenge's tour-stop in Kitchener, Ontario -- Dave Sim's home town, which I also visited annually throughout the 1990s. I miss Dave, I miss Ger (and Rose), and I sure miss Kitchener -- and when I do, why, there's nothing like a viewing of The Last Polka to cheer me up. We'll see if Kinky Boots has the same kick when I'm aching for a taste of Merry Ol' Northampton, but I'll let ya know as soon as Marge and I get a chance to see it.

    Just thought you Moore & Reppion fans should know about this bit of trivia...
    ____________________________________________

    Speaking of "based on a true story" movies, there's one about to screen this weekend that's got members of the President Clinton Administration up in arms, representing as it seems to (and I hasten to emphasize "seems to," as I haven't seen the film) another volley of Disney/ABC-funded pro-Bush Administration, pro-GOP propaganda.

    Disney, as you may recall, is the studio that financed and then ix-nayed Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, prompting Moore and Miramax to hastily revamp distribution plans -- while Disney feebly countered the popularity of Moore's film with the feel-good travelogue Louis Schwartzberg's America's Heart & Soul (2004), which was a resounding failure at the boxoffice. But then again, Fahrenheit 9/11 didn't win the election, either (glib, I know, but what the hell, it's early in the day). The airwaves aren't as monopolized as they were in the '70s, when ABC/CBS/NBC ruled uber all, but it's still disturbing enough to be reading about the developing controversy over the pending national broadcast of Path to 9/11 and see its promotion -- which plays up the docudrama's basis in the published 9/11 Commission Report -- and note the conflation of TV docudrama and documentary these ads are indeed nurturing.

    Hence, the following letter I sent earlier this week to ABC via
  • here, the "Working for Change" site.

  • A quick bit of background: Working for Change has mounted an aggressive campaign to call Disney & ABC on the carpet, soft-pedalling a bit by titling "Working Assets"'s online essay the link above takes you to, "ABC: Tell the Truth About 9/11.

    However, ABC's parent corporation is indeed Disney, and Disney and ABC's Republican leanings have been widely reported and evidence elsewhere. That's in the body of the essay, but not the headline, for what it's worth.

    Working Assets writes:

    "On September 10th and 11th, ABC -- which is owned by Disney -- is planning to air a "docu-drama" called Path to 9/11, which is being billed as "an objective telling of the events of 9/11." In fact, the film was written by an unabashed conservative who twists the facts to blame President Clinton."

    Note, in fact, screenwriter Cyrus Nowrasteh previously scripted & directed the TV movie The Day Reagan Was Shot (2001) -- produced by none other than Oliver Stone -- as well as the TV biopic about Black activist A. Philip Randolph and the Pullman Strike, 10,000 Black Men Named George (2002). That's not alarming in and of itself, nor does Path to 9/11 director David L. Cunningham have much to cite relevent here; it's primarily project parent corporations Disney and ABC setting off alarm bells for me.

    Continuing:

    "In fact, the list of counterterrorism initiatives undertaken by the Clinton administration is lengthy and comprehensive. Regrettably, the record shows that most of these efforts were watered down or abandoned by the Bush administration when they came into office. History will also record that President Bush was the one who received -- and while on vacation, chose to ignore -- a Presidential Daily Briefing on August 6, 2001 entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US."

    ABC's new six-hour film was apparently screened in advance only to conservative bloggers and journalists -- and received extensive praise from none other than Rush Limbaugh. ABC is advertising the film as being "based on the 9/11 Commission report" -- yet also admits that it's a "docu-drama," in which writers and producers are free to invent and distort facts. Former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke has already completely refuted one of the key scenes of the movie.


    Terrorists, Path to 9/11 style

    It's simply stunning to think that as this fall's election approaches, a major television network would devote six hours of prime-time programming to air such a slanted and inaccurate program. There is simply no way that a conservative writer, with an anti-Clinton axe to grind, should be allowed to use public airwaves to broadcast a gross distortion of the truth -- especially on the anniversary of the worst day in our history."

    Well, I was initially wary of all this, and did some homework. It seems the film was indeed screened for conservative bloggers and journalists; Rush and other online conservative and neocon bloggers are touting the film; that Clinton administration officials other than Clarke have also expressed alarm over the content of the film, and indeed cuts and trims have already been made to address (on some level) those misrepresentations of the actual 9/11 Committee report; and most of all, the advertising I've seen -- in print and online -- touts the film as factual.

    Of course, there's already an adundance of 9/11 films, videos and DVDs circulating now -- including the essentially apolitical documentary On Native Soil (recommended, and as apolitical a doc on the subject as one can find amid all the potshots from both sides) and equally apolitical docudrama United 93, which I most highly recommend (potent, powerful filmmaking on many levels, and quite pure in its intent and impact), and reportedly apolitical Oliver Stone epic World Trade Center, still in theaters, which I've yet to see.

    If anything, one imagines ABC/Disney may be vying with national dis-ease and overload by the time Path to 9/11 is finally broadcast this weekend -- but damn it, the fucking GOP got Robert Allan Ackerman's utter tame, timid & toothless Ronald Reagan docudrama yanked off the air a mere two years ago for much less provocative content than Path to 9/11's already-controversial disconnect between the historical record and its promotion.

    Still reeling, too, from Hallmark Entertainment and Showtime Network revisionist atrocity DC 9/11: Time of Crisis (2003; a truly staggering take clearly refuted by so many aspects of the real 9/11 Commission report that one doesn't even know where to begin dismantling its audacious rewriting of history), I felt the need to register my discomfort with all this, especially given Disney & ABC's consolidated corporate power at this time.

    With all that in mind, I acted on the sites' "Call to action: Send a message to ABC asking them to cancel the show" (deadline: 9/10/2006), adapting the boilerplate letter to reflect the facts and my concerns more accurately.

    Here's my letter, in its entirity:

    [Revised subject line:]
    _________

    Presenting docudrama as fiction is one thing, but presenting it as fact is another -- This looks like sheer propaganda, and if so, needs to be cancelled!
    ____________

    As a TV viewer of 51 years, I've long tempered my own view of what's "docudrama" and what's drama, based on experiencing what passes for docudrama in the broadcast arena.

    The offenses and abuses often outweigh the premise of being based upon factual accounts, though each work must be taken on its own merits and particulars. It's bad enough when such docudramas involve real-life murders, tragedies or horror stories, but when it involves nothing less than the most terrible day of America's recent history, one must pay more attention to anything presenting itself as fact or even as a docudrama than one would to a dramatization of a personal tragedy or murder case.

    PATH TO 9/11 promises to be a potent docudrama -- but your promotion of the upcoming PATH TO 9/11 is presenting this particular docu-drama AS FACT.

    Sight unseen, reacting ONLY to your OWN promotion of the program, I find this very disturbing, especially during a hotly-contested election season.

    Until I see the programming myself, I of course cannot judge its content. However, I can react to YOUR promotion of it.

    The fact -- FACT -- that the film was scripted by a self-proclaimed conservative activist, and already netting praise from pundits like Rush Limbaugh, is disturbing in the extreme. The FACT that ABC reportedly prescreened this six-hour opus only for conservative bloggers and journalists is also great cause for concern, indicating clearly that ABC had a targetted audience in mind, one based upon pre-determined ideological and political prejudices.

    This leads me to believe, with some basis of evidence, that the docudrama doesn't present our President lounging on the longest vacation in Presidential history just prior to 9/11. What other historical facts are skewed? I'll have to wait to see PATH TO 9/11, I reckon. But it doesn't sound promising.

    That you are presenting this speculative docudrama as FACT a scant two months before a national election in which Republicans have decided to make fear and security the central issues of their campaigns is grossly irresponsible and a great abuse of corporate power.

    I have read already that former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke has debunked one of the film's central scenes (a sequence involving Sandy Berger) as completely false. The fact that Clarke WAS there before 9/11, has been critical of the Bush Administration's handling of 9/11 before and after 9/11, and has written and spoken about his participation and the events that led up to and followed 9/11, is relevent: Clarke's opinion of PATH TO 9/11 carries considerable weight for me.

    If he's alarmed, I am alarmed. Especially if Rush is happy with your film. This doesn't sound promising as a docudrama reflecting anything truly factual.

    The screenwriter of PATH TO 9/11, Cyrus Nowrasteh, is an avowed conservative. He is an activist in the promotion of his political convictions via film and television, and has spoken on a panel entitled "How Conservatives Can Lead Hollywood's Next Paradigm Shift?"

    This is a recipe for disaster (pun intended), and clearly places the entire ABC Network's political affiliations, associations, assumptions and prejudices in the public arena for ALL TO SEE.

    If ABC were airing, at the same time, a six-hour docudrama or documentary presenting another take (the liberal take? I can't use the word "radical," as the conservatives and neoconservatives currently running this country have proven themselves more radical than any previous administration in my lifetime), I could see some semblence of balance or merit in broadcasting PATH TO 9/11.

    If ABC were promoting PATH TO 9/11 as FICTION, or perhaps science fiction, I could stomach that, too. If PATH TO 9/11 were being retitled TRIUMPH OF THE WILL 2, that might properly reflect the propagandistic intentions of the broadcast.

    If, if, if --

    But the ads I've seen thus far are presenting the film and promoting it AS FACTUAL.

    Let's be blunt.

    There is simply no way that the product of a radically conservative production team and screenwriter -- the latter with an anti-Clinton axe to grind and aggressive pro-conservative agenda to use Hollywood and TV movies to promote his political views -- can be allowed to use public airwaves to broadcast a gross distortion of the truth (a docudrama that participants in that historical reality are already identifying AS a gross distortion of the truth).

    That ABC is doing so on the anniversary of the most tragic day in our recent history -- a day already being shamelessly used in the most hideous manner imaginable to promote a radical conservative political agenda -- AND two months before an important national election, is sheer exploitation of the worst kind, and a betrayal of the network's pact with the public for use of the public airwaves.

    Unless I IMMEDIATELY see ads and promotional spots proclaiming PATH TO 9/11 as fiction, and specifically fictional propaganda produced to air a particular political viewpoint -- agitprop -- I call upon you to pull PATH TO 9/11 from its scheduled airing on Monday.

    Two years ago, the conservatives insisted upon the same for a far less insidious biographical docudrama about President Ronald Reagan.

    PATH TO 9/11 already promises to be a far, far greater offense.

    I look forward to your reply to my letter. Thank you for your attention.

    Sincerely,

    Stephen R. Bissette

    __________

    UPDATE: 12:50 PM:

    This just in on Path to 9/11 from MoveOn.org -- I added a personal comment and signed -- please check it out, in part for the additional info and links to sources:
    _____________

    Dear MoveOn member,

    In a little over 48 hours, ABC will air a five-hour "docudrama" on the 9/11 attacks. The movie was written and produced by a right-wing activist who fabricated key scenes to blame Democrats and defend Republicans.1 It's so partisan that even Rush Limbaugh was surprised ABC decided to air it.2 And an FBI agent who was brought in to consult on the docudrama quit because, he said, "they were making things up."3

    Public outrage is mounting across the country, and Variety reports that ABC is now "mulling the idea of yanking the mini altogether."4 But we only have a little time to act. We'll start delivering this petition to ABC headquarters tomorrow at noon and continue as more signatures come in. So we're looking for 200,000 signatures TODAY.

    Can you sign? Click here:
    http://pol.moveon.org/abcdoc?id=8706-5308717-GrURuh9m0D8wk0QerBfbrA&t=4

    Then please pass on this message to folks you know who can help.

    The Path to 9/11 appears to be part of a coordinated push—including speeches by President Bush and millions of dollars in advertising—to exploit the five-year anniversary of 9/11 for political gain. That's not acceptable from anyone—especially not a news organization like ABC.

    It's not just that ABC's movie is slanted. Big parts of it are simply untrue. The producer himself even admitted to simply improvising a key scene which depicts the Clinton administration letting bin Laden go when they had him in their sights—a complete fabrication.5 Last night, the movie's star, Harvey Keitel, said "It turned out not all the facts were correct."6

    It's really pretty simple: ABC shouldn't have any role in the political exploitation of 9/11. But this docudrama is designed to do just that—spreading a false message to millions of viewers across the country.

    Sign the petition to tell ABC not to air partisan propaganda on 9/11. Click here:

    http://pol.moveon.org/abcdoc?id=8706-5308717-GrURuh9m0D8wk0QerBfbrA&t=5

    Thank you for all you do.

    Nita, Eli, Carrie, Joan, Jennifer and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team
    Friday, September 8th, 2006

    P.S. For the most current information on the scandal involving this film, and for more information on the movie itself, please visit our friends at ThinkProgress:

    http://www.thinkprogress.org

    Sources:
    1. "Writer of ABC's 9/11 'Docudrama' Is Avowed Conservative Activist," ThinkProgress, September 1, 2006
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=2047&id=8706-5308717-GrURuh9m0D8wk0QerBfbrA&t=6

    2. "Clintonoids Prepare To Attack 9/11 Movie," The Rush Limbaugh Show, August 30, 2006
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=2049&id=8706-5308717-GrURuh9m0D8wk0QerBfbrA&t=7

    3. "FBI Agent Who Consulted On Path to 9/11 Quit," ThinkProgress, September 7, 2006
    http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/07/fbi-agent-quit/

    4. "Under fire, ABC mulls yanking mini," Variety, September 7, 2006
    http://www.variety.com/VR1117949675.html

    5. Greg Mitchell, Editor & Publisher, MSNBC appearance, September 7, 2006
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=2077&id=8706-5308717-GrURuh9m0D8wk0QerBfbrA&t=8

    6. "Harvey Keitel speaks out on Path to 9/11: 'It turned out not all the facts were correct'", Showbiz Tonight, September 7, 2006
    http://www.moveon.org/r?r=2078&id=8706-5308717-GrURuh9m0D8wk0QerBfbrA&t=9

    Act as your own conscience dictates, and see you here over the weekend...

    Thursday, September 07, 2006

    Emergency Alert: Cartoonist Loses All in Fire -- Help If You Can --

    This just posted on the CCS discussion board by Jon-Mikel:

    Cartoonist Lea Hernandez' house burned down last night and she lost most of her valuables, including two dogs and four cats. Any donations would be deeply appreciated. You can find her here.

    If you'd like to donate, her PayPal email is divalea@gmail.com.

    For other donations, write to her friend Lisa Jonte at lrjonte@arcanumvisual.com to get Lea's ground address, and to find out if they can use your donation (no clothes, for instance - nowhere to put them!).

    VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE!

    I voted in the state primary yesterday, via absentee ballot -- I'll be teaching all day next Tuesday, away in White River Junction throughout primary polling hours (and into Wednesday night, as I teach this year at The Center for Cartoon Studies two days a week). It was quick, easy, and a satisfying first step in what promises to be a vital election season.

    ...I urge you all to VOTE this year. There's no excuse not to, period. Whatever flinders remain of our shattered democracy, voting is still our primary bid to retain some measure of expressing our political will and beliefs. I'm lucky -- I still live in a pocket of the US where ballots are hand-written, hand-counted, and accountability is still possible. What to do in the land of the untraceable, unaccountable (and should be illegal) electronic voting booths?

    I don't know.

    But I urge you, one and all, to VOTE.

    VOTE if for no reason other than to have your say about what direction you want, wish this country, your country, should be going in. Vote if only to register your confidence in, or lack of confidence in, the ongoing reign of the Republican party. They've got all seats of federal power, save for the judicial (which they've been working on), in their hands. So, are you happy with how things have been going the last six years? Are you unhappy?

    Surely you have some notion about that.

    VOTE.
    ____

    It's a liability and embarrassment to our nation that so few Americans do vote.

    Do we honestly believe all the red, white and blue dogma we are so forcefully ramming down the throat of the world?

    If we do, why are so few of us voting -- in the primaries (which, as Connecticut's primary demonstrated two weeks ago, are vital) or in the elections, state and national?

    The percentage of eligible voters who turned out in the last ten-to-fifteen years to vote is ridiculously low, particularly for a country so arrogantly flaunting democracy as a be-all-and-end-all ideology.

    Do you believe in the right to vote? If so, do you vote?

    If not, why not?

    Don't give me that line of horseshit.

    There's no excuse.

    VOTE.
    _________

    For those 18 to 30, I urge you to vote if only to acknowledge you and your generation have a very real stake in the direction the US has been going since 2001.

    Vote, proactively or preemptively, to either promote or prevent your being drafted into the military, for instance.

    The possibility of this President and administration reinstating the draft is increasingly probable and problematic -- in fact, it's only the inevitable backlash against their doing so that keeps that in check. But the steady depletion of available military human resources and reserves, and eroding volunteers willing to serve, is leading us to the brink. Whatever your thoughts or feelings about the matter, it's simple: do you wish/intend to serve, and thus think/feel others should be compelled to either serve or not serve in the military, too?

    Get off your ass, register to vote if you haven't already, and VOTE.

    If you're a college student -- and I've said this and will continue to say this to my own CCS students -- sort out the possible complexities of your ability to vote in the coming election, and be sure you can and will be able to vote, either via absentee ballot from your home town or in the town/city you attend college in. Given the problems many college students faced in registering and in voting the last two elections, which was reported via various national news venues, there's no excuse for that going down for you -- sort it out, now, take the necessary steps, and VOTE.
    ____

    Lest you think my playing "the draft card" (I still have mine from the early '70s; yep, I registered -- my Dad would have shot me if I hadn't -- was in the lottery, and luckily my number didn't come up, but I sure remember that night watching the lottery on national television, sweating it out) is a cheap shot, wake up.

    It's a numbers game. The Iraq War has seriously depleted military reserves, and quite rational (to my mind) decisions to not serve under the present delusional, irrational and arguably dangerous current President and administration have considerably eroded volunteerism for the military. This situation has been reported repeatedly in the past two years (always sans the decisive issue: who would want to willingly serve under the present Commander in Chief, given his ongoing behavior and record?), and the extremes the military has had to go to (e.g., extended tours of duty, calling in retired soldiers who have already served their country, etc.) on top of the arguably abusive misuse of the entire National Guard to wage the Iraq War clearly demonstrates how dire the situation has become.

    The draft, or some variation on the draft, is at this point a rational eventuality. It's just a matter of time, the way this administration is going. The President's and his administration's abysmal misuse and squandering of the voluntary military has taken a terrible, terrible toll, and the numbers alone are pushing us closer and closer to that inevitability: military draft.

    And it is no longer a gender issue, as it was for my generation, when tens of thousands of young men were shipped off to Vietnam: men and women will be drafted.

    Whatever your gender, weigh your convictions, your beliefs, and your options.

    Weigh your thoughts and feelings about being drafted: having your future -- life or death -- redirected and/or determined by our government.

    Think about it.

    Now, VOTE.
    ___________________

    If I'd needed any impetus to make sure I didn't miss voting in the primary as well as the coming November election, our fearless leader provided an ample boot-to-the-ass with his latest speech in a series of exploitative, fear-mongering, power-crazed 9/11 speeches we're being treated to, compliments of Karl Rove and a very pragmatically concerned Republican Party.

    They've been ruling the roost for five years now, unchallenged and unchecked, and the very real consequences of their agenda, policies, actions and inactions are coming home to roost.

    Holy shit, time to hit the "terrrer" and fear buttons, BIG TIME!

    While working at the home office yesterday, I listened to the entirity of President Bush's speech to the nation, and it was a scorcher -- his increasingly astonishing blend of blunt 'fessing up to previously denied "accusations" (read: reality reported but denied by the administration), self-serving distortions of reality put across with the occasional emphatic banging on the podium to hammer home his patronizin -- uh, patriotic determination, and typical passing-the-buck for delays in due process caused by his and his administration's ongoing attempts to circumvent national and international law. In short order, Bush treated us all to admission of the secret European detention camps, of use of torture (ahem, excuse me, "alternative interrogation methods"), palming the blame for delayed trials off on Congress and the courts (instead of his administration's five years of illegal practices and inability to bend the law to his will) -- and shamelessly doing so before an audience comprised in part of families of 9/11 victims! -- while launching this excrutiating display with the expected instant-association of 9/11 with his fucking "Wer on Terrrer" (per his twist of the phrase; can't you hear him now?).

    As I and many others have said repeatedly since 2002, this isn't a war on anything definable.

    It's a war on a military tactic -- hence, by definition, unwinnable.

    Ever.

    There can, by definition, never be victory.

    You do understand that, don't you? That by his own definition of this war, of victory, the President himself has created this unresolvable conundrum?

    To top it off, we are expected to accept his most outlandish claims -- tracing what Bush touts as proof of the effectiveness of these detention and torture techniques via previously unreported cause-and-effect foiling of various "terrrerist" plots -- on the heels of his finally admitting to the very secret CIA detention camps and "alternative interrogation techniques" previously vehemently denied.

    The man sees no conflict, no disconnect, no reason for suspicion and indeed absolute moral outrage in the contextual reality of his speech's most outrageous components.

    Bush simply refuses to acknowledge for a nanosecond we no longer believe a word he says -- after repeated conflations of 9/11 and Iraq over a period of five years clashing with the reality of his own blunt admission of no connection as recently as two weeks ago (at the most recent press conference), the man and his cronies are simply no longer credible on any count.

    Anyone who continues to fall for this shit is a fool. Period.

    The verbal 'sleight-of-hand' shell-game rhetoric of deflect, misdirect and redirect -- the transparent redirection of culpability for four years+ of detainees and suspected terrorists not coming to trial onto the heads of the current Congress, who Bush is calling for instantaneous solutions for legal dilemmas he and his administration clearly created -- can only fool, well, a fool at this point.

    Bush and his cronies state as fact that such-and-such detainee is a terrorist, and proceed from that simply cause-and-define presumption to their outlandish statements -- though not one single detainee has been brought to successful trial and prosecution from the morass of illegal detention and interrogation camps scattered across the globe.

    Bush is asking, emphatically, for Congress to "act quickly" and decisively upon his current recommendations -- making it their problem, implicitly their fault with a churlish turn of phrasing -- skirting the absolutely core issue that it is Bush and Rumsfeld and Gonzales and this administration that has delayed, obfuscated, and caused the lack of any forward momentum to the trials he is now calling for (and the President is calling for this imperative to the applause of those who lost loved ones in the 9/11 attack, further aggravating the absolutely staggering arrogance, refusal to take responsibility and deceit explicit in his framing of these very issues in his speech).

    Bush still emphatically insists upon redefining the rules of engagement, based on nothing but his say-so, insisting upon redefinitions of due process to allow government prosecution sans presentation of any evidence on the claims said evidence is a matter of national security. We're to take the word of men who are proven liars, from the simplest of deceptions (e.g., Vice President Dick Cheney's debate-opening bald-faced lie about never having met or seen Senator John Edwards on the Senate floor, instantly disproved by news footage of Cheney introducing Edwards and family on the Senate floor) to their most deceitful behavior on the international stage, justifying the eruption of the Iraq War with constant and insistent conflation of 9/11 and Saddam Hussein to their desired end.

    It was incredibly infuriating, a mad and revealing display of unrepentent power refuting all culpability for so much, while ceaselessly trumpeting already-failed strategies, outlandish abuses of power contrary to national and international law, and boastful assertions of fragmentary, untraceable claims of "success" as "fact." You know, the usual.

    I haven't a clue what the expected outcome of such speeches is in the mind of Bush and his compatriots in crim -- uh, this administration. I'm relieved to see this morning almost all the major news reporting on his speech is focusing on the admission of international detention camps, which Bush positively bragged about.

    There's no doubt first and foremost Bush and his advisors are determined to shape the coming weeks's national dialogue. Note the the blatant effort to redirect an election season's dialogue away from the utter failure of the Iraq War, Hurricane Katrina, collapsing public education, record job losses, the economy, any coherent energy policy (don't even get me going on that one -- the man whose administration buried the electric car and allowed GM to salt the very earth that successful alternative energy solution was buried in, touting viable alternatives while the oil industry pockets record-busting profits!)... name your poison, they don't want you thinking/talking/voting based on that reality.

    But thus far, they've only succeeded in drawing our national attention to their own Nazi-like behavior patterns, only emphasizing their own failures and, as of yesterday, admitting to the very abuse of power many voting Americans are growing increasingly alarmed by.
    ____________

    As if Bush's on the record speech yesterday wasn't absolutely infuriating enough, there's always his
  • forever revealing off-the-record comments to savor, like this pip in The NY Daily News, with an even pippier Karl Rove bon mot.

  • Therein, former Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal recounts a November 2004 visit by President Bush and his political guru Karl Rove to the William J. Clinton Library in Little Rock, Arkansas, on the banks of the Arkansas River.

    "Bush appeared distracted and glanced repeatedly at his watch," Blumenthal writes about a presidential tour during the library's dedication. "When he stopped to gaze at the river, where Secret Service agents were stationed in boats, the guide said: 'Usually, you might see some bass fishermen out there.' Bush replied: 'A submarine could take this place out.'"...

    Blumenthal, who attributes his account to two anonymous eyewitnesses, adds that "Rove showed keen interest in everything he saw, and asked questions, including about costs, obviously thinking about a future George W. Bush library and legacy. "'You're not such a scary guy,' joked his guide. 'Yes, I am,' Rove replied. Walking away, he muttered deliberately and loudly: 'I change constitutions, I put churches in schools.'"


    As my amigo Jean-Marc Lofficier so succinctly put it this morning,

    "Must... control.... the rage..... Harder to do these days. :-)"

    Wednesday, September 06, 2006

    Head Trauma, Lost Girls, The Steve Geppi Museum, and More... Well, Actually, Wednesday AM Musings, and Nothing More



    I showed the Center for Cartoon Studies students the trailer for Head Trauma last night to launch the evening's activities, and looks like their appetites are up for writer/director Lance Weiler's appearance at CCS next Thursday.

    Of course, the CCS students will be getting privileged peeks at material along with privileged time with Lance and yours truly. I've no idea what Lance is planning, but I'll be bringing in some of the original art Dan and I worked up for the filming, in part to show them there was no actual, readable tract entitled "Nothing But Grief", but rather a prop mockup with wraparound cover, a handful of pages with actual new content, and the rest was dummied up (with pages -- never onscreen -- from the Jim Woodring co-created Jack T. Chick tract parody minicomic "Jesus Saves", which seemed appropriate). Like so much of cinema, it's all "smoke and mirrors," really, with the comic tract that coheres so completely in the context of the film into a tangible comic actually being composed of various bits and pieces, some drawn months apart.

    George (Vince Mola) at the phone booth, about to find -- the comic tract. Staging this discovery in the phone booth was my suggestion, based in part on my own discovery of fundamentalist Christian literature tucked into phone booths: it's a tried to true tactic, hit 'em when they're vulnerable! Hmmm, what to do as phone booths become an artifact of the 20th Century?

    The photocopy-created "Nothing But Grief" prop was originally prepared for the summer 2004 shoot involving the protagonist George (Vince Mola); the rest of the interior pages which appear in the film, as George reads and rereads the comic alone in his dead grandmother's abandoned (and genuinely creepy) house, were drawn much later, primarily by myself (pencils, inks and typeset lettering), based on extensive phone conversations with Lance and my own screening of the rough cut of the film. In the end, there was (and is) no hands-on hard copy of a real minicomic; it's as ethereal a creation as almost everything in movies, its almost-tangible illusory reality created by careful composition while filming and calculated editing decisions. Thus, Lance makes fragmentary components of a non-existent comic -- panels, pages, portions of both -- appear to be actual parts of a seen "whole," e.g., the prop minicomic. In movies, seeing is believing, but there was no need to address anything but the components necessary to the illusion.

    This gave us enormous freedom to create and recreate the comic piecemeal, and to order as Head Trauma organically grew from the original script and initial shoots into the film it is today. Part of that freedom was nurtured by the absolute autonomy Lance maintained as filmmaker: sans studio umbrellas or constraints, Lance was free to elaborate, improvise and do whatever was necessary (if affordable) to re-compose particular elements of the work-in-progress, expanding upon resonant concepts/imagery as time, budget and availability of talent permitted. Since Dan and I were available throughout the production and post-production process, Lance knew he could call for the creation of new panels or pages none of us had imagined in the summer of 2004 when shooting began; since the only immutable aspect of the minicomic were the covers that Vince handled during that summer shoot (and at least one interior shoot later), Lance, Dan and I were free to rework and refine the interior pages as Lance needed. The audience would, in the end, see (via insert shots of the panels and pages) what George/Vince was "reading" without seeing the actor actually interact with anything but the original prop -- front and back cover and dummied-up interior pages -- and the sky was the limit on what, indeed, those interior pages harbored.

    Portion of a panel of "Nothing But Grief" art, pencilled by Daniel Bissette, based on one of Gustave Dore's Edgar Allan Poe's The Raven illustrations, and inked by yours truly. This was the second panel Dan drew up; not everything we drew made it into the film, BTW.

    Part of the freedom afforded by such truly independent filmmaking is based in part on donated efforts on behalf of many creative collaborators and partners, and in this case, Dan and I were indeed donating our time and effort. It was worth it for the marvelous learning experience, and by his very nature Lance made that education an ongoing source of creative pleasure: we were made to feel part of the creative process, urged to offer suggestions which were actually listened to and integrated into the whole. We weren't creating just a prop to be handled and disposed of: the tract was a character in the film, and by being asked to contribute more than a mere prop, being made part of the entire process of fleshing out the Head Trauma concept and script into as potent a cinematic experience as possible, Lance solicited much more than originally suggested. Free to create new panels specifically tied into filmed images that resonated with the viewing of the two rough edits I screened, my own storytelling chops and imagination were being brought into play -- and that was fun!

    More on Head Trauma this week and weekend --

    -- but don't forget, if you live in the southern VT, NH or northern Massachusetts area, Head Trauma begins its week-long run at Brattleboro VT's Latchis Theater this Friday night!

    I'll be there Friday & Saturday to introduce the film and field audience Q&A, and Lance will be at the Latchis in person one week from today, on Wednesday, September 13th.

    It's a film worth seeing at least twice, so plan on catching it -- and us! -- twice, if you're so inclined.
    _____

    The complete edition of Lost Girls is a revelation, in part for the absolutely unprecedented showcase it provides for Melinda Gebbie's stunning color art. I was always a fan of Melinda's work, dating back to her pen-and-ink s&m comics stories in the underground women's comix; I got to know Melinda a bit during the final year or so of Taboo original run, and was often frustrated by the fact that what I saw in Melinda's originals seemed so ill-served by the (top-end) color reproduction we achieved in the Tundra/SpiderBaby volumes of Taboo featuring the initial installments.

    The slipcased, three-volume signed & numbered edition, already sold out! Still, the mass-market edition is available and already going into its second printing.

    That has been handsomely redressed via Top Shelf's impeccable production and printing, but also by something impossible to achieve back in 1991: now seen and savored in the context of the full scope of Lost Girls, Melinda's art is finally being seen as it was always meant to be seen: in its entirity.

    This is one of the unavoidable drawbacks of serializations of any graphic novel: after all, Art Spiegelman's Maus never cohered fully, even upon publication of the first volume Maus I, until it was a completed work, and there's no cheating time. Ten years is ten years, and when that's the necessary duration of the creative process, nothing can compress that necessary work into fewer years, however hungry the creator(s), publisher or potential audience.

    (To reference another recent key work, having now read and re-read the book with ample emotional rewards and surprises with each revisit, I simply can't imagine reading Alison Bechdel's masterful Fun Home in serialized form. Alison's novel is just that, a novel -- and the same is true of Lost Girls.)

    It is one of the unsung and essential aspects of the creative lives behind complex, intricate and compelling graphic novels like these that the creator(s) have had to sustain an incredible amount of discipline, focus and vital enthusiasm for the project at hand for literally years -- and often against enormous real-world odds and consequences.

    I have no idea, really, how Melinda sustained her energy and income in the fifteen years it's taken to bring Lost Girls to fruition. I've nothing but boundless admiration for her accomplishment, and the actual work itself: it's ravishing (often literally!). As I am finding out as an instructor at CCS, and seeing in younger creators like CCS associate Robyn Chapman (who is at least two years into work on her own graphic novel) and what I've seen of the upcoming biographical graphic novel series James Sturm is collaborating on with skilled artists like Rich Tommaso, this is a skill and scope the new generation of graphic novelists are cultivating from the get-go -- but it's a skillset that was pioneered by the graphic novelists of the prior generation of creators, including Alan and Melinda (among many others, going back to Jack Katz and The First Kingdom in our lifetimes, with predecessors among the woodcut graphic novelists of the early 20th Century, who often invested years, too, in single works).

    Bear in mind, too, the serialization of many graphic novels is an economic pragmatism at work: serialized and published in installments, creator(s) and publisher(s) are able to enjoy steady income, as well as the non-tangible but still vital benefits of ongoing feedback as the work unfolds and is read. Melinda enjoyed neither of those benefits. Since the demise of Lost Girls's serialization venues, she has worked, essentially, in secret, the chapters underway unseen by all but those in Melinda's immediate circle.

    It was more than a Herculean effort: those mythic labors were, after all, finite and presented enormous variety. Hercules got to flex different muscles, travel and tackle very different labors. Melinda, while working her palette in many inventive ways (each of the three key characters, and each of their sexual exploits -- real and imagined -- have their own distinctive color and textural schemes), was still working with the same physical parameters of the page (that damned rectangle! How well I know its boundaries and expanses myself!) and basically the same tools. She could work with them in different ways to different ends, but still, you get my point. Part of the challenge inherent in undertaking a work like Lost Girls is the necessity of retaining a coherent approach and style while creating and nurturing imaginative variations of that visual universe -- without unraveling the tapestry. Melinda does so in spades, and it's impossible to convey the incredible warmth, energy and life force radiating from the page -- the paltry scans I attempted to post fail miserably. You have to see the work for yourself.

    One other thing I want to mention this morning, too, is the link few will make to another forgotten landmark in Melinda's career that predated her beginning her collaboration with Alan on Lost Girls. Melinda was on the animation team that brought Raymond Briggs's magnificent graphic novel When the Wind Blows to the screen as a feature, working for months on that project in the late 1980s. Melinda once told me how important that project was to her, how everyone on that team felt they were doing something vital and worthwhile -- and it's hard to look at the clear evolution between Melinda's black-and-white comix work and the splendid color work on Lost Girls without speculating how that development was influenced by her share of the work on When the Wind Blows, intepreting Briggs's characteristic pastels & color pencil work to animation.

    One thing is for certain: those naysayers who expressed dismay about Lost Girls during its launch in Taboo (some of the letters were truly unkind) are eating their words today. Melinda has proven herself more than Alan's equal in their fecund collaboration, and Lost Girls is among the essential graphic novels of the decade.
    ________

    Thanks to pro screenwriter, Dartmouth professor and fellow WRIF (White River Indy Film festival) board member William F. Phillips, this September 6, 2006 New York Times article came to my attention this morning, "Museum of Steel: Cartoon History in a Single Bound."

    Reporter George Gene Gustines (GGG!) writes from Diamond Dist. head honcho Steve Geppi's home city Baltimore:

    "If Steve Geppi has his way, his new Entertainment Museum will be a cultural institution that children must be dragged out of rather than into. And his idea of children does not mean 12 years old and under... The 16,000-square-foot space takes up the second and third floors of the former Camden train station here, whose main floor is home to the Sports Legends at Camden Yards museum. Geppi's Entertainment Museum celebrates the colorful characters and collectibles that have emerged from comic strips and comic books since the late 1800's. Its packed displays -- of movie posters, animation cels, action figures, board games, advertisements and more -- chronicle the evolution of these characters, often reflecting the periods of American history from which they emerged.

    Mr. Geppi, 56, who owns Diamond Comic Distributors, the largest distributor of English-language comic books, is also the proud owner of every artifact on display. "It's really fun showing this to people," he said. "It's the only time I get to see my stuff."..."


    Gustines paints an evocative verbal picture of the museum's layout: "Most rooms are organized by the era they chronicle, but two rooms stray from that pattern: one will rotate exhibits that highlight a particular artist or theme and the other is devoted to comics that tell "A Story in Four Colors," as the placard over its entrance declares. This room traces the black-and-white beginnings of comic-strip characters like The Gumps (1917), Winnie Winkle (1920) and Little Orphan Annie (1924), before moving along to the pulps and a large collection of Big Little Books.... The collection of comics is boldly colorful, wide-ranging and presented alphabetically within each era. It begins, appropriately enough, with Action Comics No. 1 (1938), the first appearance of Superman. It ends with more contemporary comics, like the gimmicky Superman No. 75 (1992), which chronicled his apparent death and was distributed sealed in black plastic, and the more somber 9-11 (2002), whose proceeds were donated to relief agencies. In between are comics that commemorate the first appearances of Captain America, the Flash, Green Lantern, the Hulk, She-Hulk and Wonder Woman.

    Like many of the artifacts on display, most of the comics are valuable and kept safely behind glass. But a video kiosk helps circumvent this drawback. Visitors can view
    Action Comics No. 1 or Superman No. 1 (1939) on a monitor. People can navigate each page with "back" and "forward" options. The presentation uses Mr. Geppi's vintage copies, so the experience feels authentic: the pages are yellowed with age, the original advertisements are included, and the monitor shows the rise and fall of each page as it is "turned." Kiosks are placed throughout the museum, each with an interactive offering appropriate to its location...."

    Whatever my own misgivings about Diamond and its role in comics history, kudos to Steve for pulling this off, and I'm certain this will outlive the previous (noble) efforts to sustain comics-related museums (thankfully, a few have survived).

    In any case, Congrats to Steve Geppi, and -- CCS roadtrip in the offing!

    Tuesday, September 05, 2006

    Good Morning -- Another Tuesday That Feels Like Monday --

    If you've been away all weekend, please note there's lots of goodies I posted over the weekend, including announcements for this and next week's personal appearances by yours truly in connection with filmmaker Lance Weiler's national screenings of his new feature Head Trauma (which weaves a comic drawn by my son Dan and I into its insidious narrative); a full illustrated review of The Wicker Man remake; the fourth part of the Home Movie Day essay; my initial comments on the fantastic new graphic novel, complete at last, from Chris Staros at Top Shelf, who've graced us all with the complete Alan Moore & Melinda Gebbie erotic classic Lost Girls (about which I'll be writing more in the coming week or two); and much, much more.

    So, check it all out. Lots of reading for those of you who spent Labor Day Weekend away from the computer. Enjoy.

    And as my old Johnson State College buddy Dave Booz reminds us (in the comments on one of this weekend's posts), "...I hope one and all enjoy labor day it is brought to you from the brotherhood of united carpenters of america. believe it or not they started labor day" -- a refresher relevent to this 21st Century era of discouraging organized labor and unions.

    You know, I saw a huge number of Republicans & avowed conservatives enjoying the holiday, despite their steadfast loathing of the premise of organized labor and the strength of unions.

    As for other comments worth noting here:

    Baden Smith writes, "OK, can I say I'm loving your report of the Home Film Fest - are events like these common? I've never heard of the concept before, but it's a good 'un."

    Baden, I know this is a relatively new thing, and have no idea if it's taken off nationally, but wouldn't be surprised to know it has. The Northeast Historic Film Museum has hosted such events up in their Bucksport, Maine digs at the Alamo Theater, and I know the previous Home Movie Day event in the Hanover/White River Jct. area spawned similar events the same weekend this year in other New England locations, including one in Burlington, VT. I'll tap the organizers, Bruce & John, for their take in this, and report back to you via the concluding chapter (still a ways away!) of my essay.

    I've got a full week ahead, prepping for the launch of the new semester at The Center for Cartoon Studies, committee work on the Marlboro Broadband Committee and the four-town cooperative we're part of, the Board of Directors for The Common Ground restaurant -- which we hope to reopen later this fall -- and more, hence the jam-packed weekend postings. I don't know how much I can post this week here, but I'll do my best to stay daily with it.

    Among the posts I'm working on is another piece on The Joe Kubert School of Cartoon & Graphic Art, Inc., my alma mater, which (along with the beloved Joe & Muriel Kubert) put me on my feet to become a professional cartoonist. That's underway, but leads me to today's post. I apologize in advance for the exclusionary nature of this post -- it's really directed at fellow pros -- and hope this doesn't discourage any of you from reading on:

    _____________

    A notice for fellow artists and comics and commercial art professionals:

    It's rare that I address my fellow professionals via this blog,
    but I am making an exception this morning.

    Please not and honor Joe Kubert's request, that this petition is "intended to be signed specifically by cartoonists, animators, and comic book artists." Thanks.

    This email from the great Joe Kubert arrived this past week, and is worthy of your immediate attention. If you are so moved to add your name to this petition, note that you are to email
    Dr. Rafael Medoff,
    director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies
    at: rafaelmedoff@aol.com --
    -- not Joe.
    Thank you.

    Read on, please:
    ______________

    from the desk of
    JOE KUBERT



    August 30, 2006


    Dear colleague:

    I don't usually get involved in international controversies. But I am outraged by the refusal of the Polish government to return artwork belonging to a fellow-cartoonist and Auschwitz survivor, Mrs. Dina Babbitt. And I am writing to ask you to join me in protesting this injustice.

    Deported to Auschwitz as a teenager, Mrs. Babbitt's life was spared by the infamous war criminal, Dr. Josef Mengele, after he saw a mural of Snow White that she had painted on the wall of the children's barracks to soothe the children in their final hours. He then compelled her to paint portraits of Gypsies upon whom he was performing his barbaric "experiments."

    After the war, Mrs. Babbitt relocated to California, where she worked as an animator for Warner Brothers and Jay Ward Productions. Among other things, she illustrated such characters as Wile E. Coyote, Cap'n Crunch, and Tweety Bird for many years.

    Some years ago, unbeknownst to Mrs. Babbitt, eight of the paintings she did at Auschwitz resurfaced and were acquired by the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, a Polish government institution on the site of the former death camp. Mrs. Babbitt visited the museum and verified that they are hers (they are even signed "Dina 1944"), but the Poles refused to give them back, claiming they are legally the property of the museum.

    Four years ago, when I wrote the book Yossel, about a teenage cartoonist whose life was spared by the Nazis because they were amused by his drawings, I did not know that there had been a real-life case that bore similarities to my book. I was stunned to learn of Mrs. Babbitt, and even more stunned by the Polish government's position.

    Together with officials of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, an organization with which I have been active, I have prepared a petition to the Polish authorities. It is intended to be signed specifically by cartoonists, animators, and comic book artists. Adam, Andy, and I are very much hoping that you will join us.

    To have your name added to the petition, please send an email to the Wyman Institute's director, Dr. Rafael Medoff, at: rafaelmedoff@aol.com.

    With thanks in advance for your support,



    Sincerely,

    Joe Kubert,
    President
    e-mail: kubert@earthlink.net
    website: www.kubertsworld.com
    Joe Kubert School of Cartoon
    & Graphic Art, Inc.
    37 Myrtle Avenue
    Dover, NJ 07801
    973-361-1327

    Summer Hours:
    M-F, 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM ET

    --------------------------------

    DRAFT

    (date)

    Mr. Piotr Cywinski, Director
    Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum
    Oswiecim, Poland
    muzeum@auschwitz.org.pl

    Dear Mr. Cywinski:

    As cartoonists, animators, and comic book artists, we are deeply troubled that the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum has refused to return the portraits that our colleague, Mrs. Dina Gottliebova Babbitt, painted in Auschwitz in 1944.

    The fundamental principle that art belongs to the artist who created it is recognized everywhere except in totalitarian countries. One would hope that Poland, having been liberated from totalitarian rule, would not revert to the mentality that regards everything as the property of the state.

    We agree that the display of Mrs. Babbitt's artwork is of great educational value, and we are pleased that the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum recognizes their importance. But that educational purpose could just as easily be achieved by displaying high-quality reproductions of the paintings, while returning the originals to their creator and rightful owner.

    Mrs. Babbitt has suffered enough. We implore you to do the right thing and give her back her paintings.

    Sincerely,

    Joe Kubert

    Adam Kubert

    Andy Kubert
    __________________

    Please note that as of this morning, the following names have been added to the petition.

    Yours should be here, too...
    __________________


    Stan Lee
    Paul Levitz
    Joe Quesada

    Charlie Adlard
    Gerry Alanguilan
    Jon Alderink
    Michael Allred
    Bob Almond
    Jim Amash
    Sal Amendola
    Brad Anderson
    Jesus Antonio
    Brian Apthorp
    Terry Austin
    Dick Ayers
    Mark Bagley
    David Baillie
    David Baron
    Eduardo Barreto
    John Beatty
    Howard Beckerman
    Howard Bender
    Daniel Best
    Stephen R. Bissette
    Laraine Blauvelt
    Craig Boldman
    Malcolm Bourne
    Tom Boyko
    Mark Brewer
    June Brigman
    William F. Brown
    Frank Brunner
    Kurt Busiek
    Orlando Busino
    Mike Carlin
    Sergio Cariello
    Terry Cronin
    Kody Chamberlain
    Keith Champagne
    Thomas Chu
    Daryll Collins
    Jason Craig
    Tony Cronstam
    Nelson Faro DeCastro
    Marc Deering
    Joseph de Haro
    Alvaro MuÒoz de la Rubia
    John Dell
    J.M. DeMatteis
    Jim Di Bartolo
    Paul Di Filippo
    Arnold Drake
    Mike Dubisch
    Jan Duursema
    David Ehrlich
    Matthew Ellis
    Steve Ellis
    Mads Eriksen
    Andrew Farago
    Sean Fernald
    Dana Fradon
    Neil Gaiman
    Sean Galloway
    Phroilan Gardner
    Ron Garney
    Drew Geraci
    Donato Giancola
    Michael T. Gilbert
    Guy Gilchrist
    Al Gordon
    John Graham
    Mick Gray
    Jackson Guice
    Dave Gutierrez
    Paul Gulacy
    Brian Jon Haberlin
    Cully Hamner
    Bo Hampton
    Tony Harris
    Michael Hassett
    Michael Higgins
    Greg Hildebrandt
    Ron Hill
    Jon Hodgson
    Brain Holguin
    Matt Hollingsworth
    Mark Irwin
    HÂvard S. Johansen
    Richard Johnston
    Steven Philip Jones
    Jason Jourdan
    Joe Jusko
    Tim Kane
    Dan Kemp
    Dave Kendall
    Rick Ketcham
    Lovern Kindzierski
    Robert Knight
    Stefan KopiÒski
    Kari Korhonen
    Aitor Kortazar
    Lewis LaRosa
    Steve Leialoha
    Steve Lieber
    Jose Luis Garcia Lopez
    Frank Lovece
    Nick Lowe
    John Lustig
    Laura Martin
    Thomas Mason
    Garry McKee
    Bob McLeod
    Jack Mendelsohn
    Ken Meyer Jr.
    Arild Midthun
    Danny Miki
    Sheldon Mitchell
    Michael Moorcock
    Romano Molenaar
    Brian Moyer
    Matt Murray
    Jon J. Muth
    Michael Netzer
    Stephan Nilson
    Graham Nolan
    Chris Offutt
    Jerry Ordway
    Tom Orzechowski
    John Ostrander
    Mike Pascale
    Jose Pardo
    Dan Parsons
    Paco Rodriguez Peinado
    Jamal Peppers
    Michael L. Peters
    Joe Prado
    Frank Quitely
    Ron Randall
    Gail Renard
    Adam Rex
    Roy Richardson
    Robin Riggs
    John Romita
    John Romita, Jr.
    Jeremy Ross
    Josef Rubinstein
    Trina Robbins
    Steve Rolston
    Jason Roth
    Paul Ryan
    Steven Sanchez
    Diana Schutz
    Bart Sears
    Martha Seidner
    Eric Shanower
    Marlin Shoop
    Bill Sienkiewicz
    Louise Simonson
    Walter Simonson
    Andrew Simpson
    Andy Smith
    Beau Smith
    Cam Smith
    Jeff Smith
    Tom Smith
    Greg Spalenka
    Art Spiegelman
    Rob Stolzer
    Mark Szorady
    Philip Tan
    Greg Theakston
    John Totleben
    Jim Tournas
    Tim Townsend
    Koi Turnbull
    Brian K. Vaughan
    Adrian Velez
    David Wade
    Dwight Williams
    Charles Paul Wilson III
    Barry Windsor-Smith
    Walden Wong
    Matthew Z. Wood
    Craig Zablo
    Mark Zingarelli
    Mark Zug

    Monday, September 04, 2006

    Head Trauma: Get Hammered This Week...



    I've been sitting on this for weeks, and it's time to lock & load -- Lance Weiler's feature film Head Trauma is finally rolling out. As already reported here numerous times, Lance was co-director (with Stefan Avalos) of the pioneer digital feature film The Last Broadcast, and back in 2004 he invited my son Dan and I do work up some comic art for use in Head Trauma. Dan and I did so, and what began as a prop in the movie gradually assumed a more vital narrative role in the film -- for which Dan and I cooked up further artwork, linking the imagery integrally into the narrative via the screeners of rough edits Lance mailed me to view.

    Thus, the comic -- a faux Christian comic tract entitled "Nothing But Grief", in the style of those we've all seen in real life, but different enough to avoid litigation -- was tied into the fabric of the film in a way rather unique, by my experience. Because Lance was shooting the feature as we turned in panels and pages, and rough-editing some sequences, we were able to organically weave the imagery Dan and I was drawing into Lance's tapestry quite imaginatively. We were sometimes designing panels to echo images Lance had already shot, which in turn prompted Lance to shoot new material to evoke links with specific panels already rendered and delivered. The end result was the most satisfactory creative experience I've had working with a filmmaker to date (in terms of some aspect my comics work being involved), and quite pleasurable.

    Dan and I weren't the only cartoonists involved, mind you. Part of what makes Head Trauma's integration of comics and cinema so unusual is the fact that there's a second narrative thread involving comics -- the creation of comics, rather than the reading of comics. One character reacts to the disturbing events unfolding by drawing his own comics pages, internalizing and interpreting what might be going on via a continuity he entitles, "Cursed!".

    These comics pages look and feel quite different from those of "Nothing But Grief", the faux Christian comic tract. Lance engaged local Pennsylvanian cartoonist Reiner Clabbers to draw these pages in various stages of completion -- roughs, pencils and inks -- thus creating two parallel tracks (tracts?) for Head Trauma's interlocking narrative threads to explore. Reiner's evocative splash page for "Cursed!" subsequently served as the cover art for the alternative soundtrack CD (see below for more info).

    Also note that Head Trauma star Vince Mola, who plays the troubled protagonist George Walker, is also a filmmaker and popular radio DJ. Lance introduced me to Vince years ago, as Vince was hard at work on his debut digital feature Bald (2001)

    If I may be so bold (having seen no less than three edits of the film), I'll add that Head Trauma is a corker of a psychological thriller on its own terms, comics components aside. I don't want to go into any detail about the particulars, as it's a film best experienced 'cold' -- the less you know about it, the better. Trust me: Check it out!

    Lance and Head Trauma have already toured the western states, and sorry for those of you reading this blog from out there that I didn't post this info and these links sooner, but I decided to wait until it was local news.

    Well, now it's local news -- I'll be introducing the Friday and Saturday night showings of Head Trauma at the Latchis Theater in nearby Brattleboro, VT this Friday and Saturday -- and Lance will be introducing the Latchis screening next Wednesday.

    Then, on Thursday, September 14th, Lance and I will be debuting the film at The Center for Cartoon Studies in White River Jct., VT -- seating is limited, so get there early! Times to be listed here in the coming days, with reminders.

    More to follow in the days ahead, including peeks at the artwork Dan and I completed... but be sure to check out the movie, whatever you do.

    Here's a slightly-abridged presentation of Lance's overview of the current tour info, along with the particulars on the upcoming DVD release (streets Sept. 26th!).

    Take it away, Lance...
    _________

    THEATRICAL:

    The first phase of the theatrical release took the movie to Portland, OR, Tucson, AZ and Albuquerque, NM. The audience response was amazing - in some cases people came more than once to see the movie! Big thanks to everyone who helped to make phase one a success.

    Next up is phase two of the release which will have HT opening on 3 screens the weekend of Sept. 8th:

    Endless Mountains Theatre - Scranton, PA 9/8 to 9/22 (a two week run!)
    Grand Cinema - E. Stroudsburg, PA 9/8 to 9/14
    Latchis Theatre - Brattleboro, VT 9/8 to 9/14
    Center for Cartoon Studies special screening - White River Jct., VT 9/14

    Then phase three will see HT open on 8 screens the weekend of Sept. 15th:

    Red Vic - San Francisco, CA
    The Grand Illusion - Seattle, WA
    The Admiral Theater - Seattle, WA
    Paramount Theater - Rutland, VT
    CCS - White River Junction, VT
    The County Theater - Doylestown, PA (limited run visit http://countytheater.com)
    [Note: CALL THE THEATER for advance ticket sales to ensure seating]
    Ambler Theater - Ambler, PA
    Bryn Mawr Theater - Bryn Mawr. PA

    Phase four of the release consists of a number of special screenings:

    NYC - Independent Film Week / IFP - special screening 9/20 (see below for details)
    NYC - special screening 9/27 details coming soon
    Philadelphia - special screening 10/7 details coming soon
    Montréal - special screening 10/17 details coming soon

    DVD RELEASES - SEPTEMBER 26th
    HEAD TRAUMA
    The HEAD TRAUMA DVD will be released nationwide on Tuesday September 26th. If you're interested in pre-ordering the following sites are taking orders.

    OVER TWO HOURS OF BONUS FEATURES
    Audio commentary by director Lance Weiler Six featurettes:
    - Cast interviews
    - Blowing up a car on a tight budget
    - Shooting in the house (working in a haunted condemned structure)
    - Johnny Magdic and his Amazing Flying
    - Comics veteran Stephen R. Bissette and son Daniel Bissette discusses the art of HEAD TRAUMA
    - Behind the music of HEAD TRAUMA
    A special collector's edition eight-page booklet with original art by
    Bissette and liner notes by GRUDGE screenwriter Stephen Susco;
    Trailers: HEAD TRAUMA and Weiler/Stefan Avalos' THE LAST BROADCAST; plus: An Easter egg or two

    Interested in pre-ordering the HEAD TRAUMA DVD? The following sites are taking orders.
    diabolik dvd - click here 14.99 (support the independent retailers of the world)
    amazon.com - click here 17.99
    barns & noble - click here 15.98
    bestbuy.com - click here 14.99
    buy.com - click here 16.75
    For more details on the HT DVD click here

    THE LAST BROADCAST special collector's edition

    A re-release collector's edition of THE LAST BROADCAST will also be released on Sept. 26th and can be pre-ordered via the sites listed above.
    OVER TWO HOURS OF BONUS FEATURES
    • Two audio commentaries by Weiler and Avalos
    • Behind-the-scenes documentaries on the production, postproduction and distribution
    • Exclusive interviews
    • "Fact or Fiction!": rare clips from the infamous public access cable show.
    • "Gallery of Gore"
    • Jim Seward Alive and Well (2 folk songs)
    • Trailers for LAST BROADCAST, HEAD TRAUMA and Avalos’ GHOSTS OF EDENDALE
    • 12-page booklet
    _____________________

    (PS: Steve back again, interrupting with some additional information. Hey, my son Dan and I have artwork in the following CD package -- one of Dan's key pieces, inked by yours truly, graces the back cover, and a couple of my Head Trauma renderings are part of the inside-packaging and CD design. And -- I did a spoken-word vocal for the alternative soundtrack CD, too. So, Bissette fans, check it out:)
    _____________________


    HEAD TRAUMA SOUNDTRACK GETTING A NATIONAL RELEASE OCT. 10th
    CURSED the HEAD TRAUMA movie project

    CURSED the HEAD TRAUMA movie project is an alternate soundtrack, a natural extension of the HEAD TRAUMA narrative. A number of musicians contributed to the soundtrack, which is intended to be played at the same time as the DVD. By syncing the CD and DVD to a special start point the viewer / listener can experience an alternate soundtrack to the movie.

    The alternate soundtrack will be coming out on Oct.10th on Park the Van records. We’re currently working on putting together a couple of shows that will feature some of the bands on the soundtrack accompanying the movie live. The soundtrack features performances by:

    Bardo Pond
    The Capitol Years
    Bitter Bitter Weeks
    Dr. Dog
    The Novenas
    The A-Sides
    National Eye
    Awol One
    Marshal Allen and Jamie Harrar
    Greg Weeks (Espers)
    Steve Garvey (Buzzcocks)
    and many more…

    [Post truncated due to technical difficulties; I'll try to restore or repost the information later!]

    ____

    [post restored! Here's the rest of the info:]

    UPCOMING FESTIVALS AND SPECIAL EVENTS

    September 17th to 21st: IFP FILMMAKER CONFERENCE - this year's IFP market has a new section called the Filmmaker Conference. I'll be speaking on two panels and also doing a special "all digital" screening of HT during "Independent Film Week" Click here for info on the Conference
    Click here for info on the Market.

    Film Independent - Digital Series Night 6 - DIYstribution Alternatives: I'm on a panel about DIY distro. Here's a brief description:
    "We conclude our series with a close look at the different exhibition and distribution options that digital tools offer today. From direct-to-cinema models, to the various alternatives via the internet and mobile devices, learn how you can reach your viewers, build audiences, and make money selling your own film!"

    Click here for more info.

    October 16th to 18th MONTREAL:
    DIGIMART - I'll be speaking at the Digimart Digital Distribution Summit in Montreal. More details soon.

    October 20th to 29th Mar del Plata:
    HEAD TRAUMA will be screening at the Mar del Plata Film Festival in Argentina. More details soon.

    PRESS AND REVIEWS
    Look for stories and reviews about HEAD TRAUMA in the following publications:
    September issue of Philadelphia Magazine
    Fall issue of Moviemaker Magazine
    October issue of Flaunt
    October issue of Fangoria
    October issue of Millimeter
    November issue of Rue Morgue
    December issue of DV magazine

    Here's some recent online HT coverage:

    Nocturnal Admissions: DVD review and director interview - HEAD TRAUMA

    Rogue Cinema - Head Trauma review

    IFC NEWS - The Final Frontier of Filmmaking: Three Stories of Self-Distribution

    FILMTHREAT - Head Trauma DVD review

    10,000 Bullets - Head Trauma review

    B-Scared.com Head Trauma - review

    Review quotes, pulled from the film's tour thus far:

    “Works its way under the skin, raising neck hairs while teasing us to pry open its psychological puzzle box.”
    - LA WEEKLY

    “A slick, original, attention-grabbing feature… pushes the medium to the edge of its artistic bounds.”
    - ALBUQUERQUE ALIBI

    “Horror outing that revives the under appreciated monster of the id to great effect.”
    - MOVIE CITY NEWS

    “You know the ones: Jacob’s Ladder, 12 Monkeys, even Lost Highway. Head Trauma is a solid induction into these halls of creepy mindfucks.”
    - THE PORTLAND MERCURY

    “Elicits effective creeps. A well executed haunted house exercise that treads the psychological vs. supernatural line.”
    - AIN’T IT COOL NEWS

    “Incredibly creepy… good re-creation of 70’s horror.”
    -TUCSON WEEKLY

    “Fright classic… surprisingly effective chiller.”
    - THE OREGONIAN

    “HEAD TRAUMA is completely pro. From packaging to film quality to the movie’s website, it seems like there was big money behind this film.”
    - LOCAL IQ

    “Unrelenting creepiness.”
    - WILLAMETTE WEEK

    AUDIO INTERVIEW:
    A couple weeks back, I was interviewed by Indie Film Nation. IFN is a podcast out of Australia that covers independent film news from around the globe. To listen to the interview click here. HEAD TRAUMA is the last interview in the show.

    STAY UP TO DATE BETWEEN NEWSLETTER UPDATES:

    For the most current updates on HT visit http://headtraumamovie.suprglu.com for Lance’s collection of all the blog entries and news links about HT from around the web.

    _______________________________________________________________


    Sunday, September 03, 2006

    Hey, one and all -- if you haven't checked in since Friday, there's a ton of new posts below, including a lengthy illustrated review of The Wicker Man remake. So take some time to drink it all in -- and here, as promised, is the continuing saga of
    Home Move Day
    ...
    _______________________________

    Screening the Past: Notes on Home Movie Daze, August 12th, 2006: Part the Fourth


    (See parts 1-3 -- unless you’ve read those already -- before reading on...)
    ___________

    Following the appetizer of Judith Kushner’s first extended reel of color 8mm family movies -- and each of our respective lunches (special thanks to John K for sharing his BLT with yours truly) -- Bruce Posner opened the afternoon viewing with a heaping helping of more 'true' home movies.

    This second course began with a second helping of Paula Kent’s British 16mm movies.

    The first of these was in black-and-white; due to the warpage of the film itself, the image drifted subtly in and out of focus initially, though this was a minor distraction. We were, after all, gazing back almost 60 years. There was a slight sepia patina to the aged film, which only enhanced its allure.

    The opening shot was Paula herself as a toddler in the mid-1930s, walking and falling on a stretch of road. How young was she? Well, the next bit of footage showcased her first birthday party, Paula explained as the screen blossomed with shots of a cozy dining area table loaded with toys and a cake; a wall filled with tacked-up birthday cards.

    1937 footage following including shots of a black (as in "negro") doll, Paula’s parents and sister, “Uncle Stan and grandfather,” and a picnic sequence beginning with the lighting of a ‘primer stove.’ Paula further explained that the family’s outdoor picnic took place in Scarborough, on the east coast of England, as we watched the procession of family shots: her grandfather (“he was an artist, I recall,” Paula told us) and grandmother, seen savoring a smoke, as was Paula’s uncle in a subsequent shot, arching his eyebrow. Beach footage elicited chuckles, given the neck-to-ankle beach wear -- “when people went to the beach then,” Paula commented pragmatically, “they went fully dressed.” “How times have changed,” someone in the room replied, to which Paula smiled, “Indeed.”

    The family footage continued: 18-month-old Paula struggling with a bike; another outdoor picnic by the family car, in a yard peppered with strutting chickens; chickens “attack” and little Paula responds in kind, chasing flustered poultry; Paula walking up another road, steadier on her feet than in the opening shot of the reel. The season suddenly shifts from summer (or fall) to winter, and cozy interiors of a family Christmas: the table set with the Christmas dinner, the carving of the poultry, etc.

    The reel abruptly changed from black-and-white to rich, splendid Kodachrome color (with its eye-popping reds), and suddenly Paula was (barely) a teenager in Devonshire. “I would guess this was about 1948,” Paula said, though she looked older than 11 or 12 as we were whisked away via point-of-view driving shots of rugged countrysides and scenic views, including the waterfall from an expansive dam. “This might have been on the southeast coast in Devon, or in Wales -- I’m not sure,” Paula hesitantly added, as her teen (or pre-teen) self stood with her “Mum” and father in the brisk, breezy air. The play of the wind was soon visually complimented by the alluring play of light and shadow on shade-speckled woodland walkways: a lovely shot of Paula and her mother walking on the trail, followed by a solo shot of Paula further along the same path. “No, this is all in Devon, in southwestern England,” Paula asserted, as the English tradition of teatime brought this portion of the 16mm reel to a close -- splicing, with the time-traveling rush we were becoming used to, into an earlier time, and Paula’s tenth birthday party.

    A gaggle of well-dressed girls and two boys crowd into the flat and camera view, and the rituals of a 1940s English birthday party were instantly underway. Paula seemed enchanted, her voice light as she said, “I remember these people, actually -- I can’t remember their names, but I remember them!” The then-traditional birthday party treat of trifle was served, followed by the ritualistic lighting of the birthday cake candles and Paula making her wish and blowing them all out. Man, that cake looked like a chore to cut! The festivities were interrupted by another time-snap -- back “on vacation somewhere,” in Elan Valley in Wales, then, just as suddenly -- we’re torn from the brief views of countryside and back at a birthday party. This disorienting sleight-of-frame is almost comedic: Paula is clearly younger than the ten-year-old we’d just seen blowing out her candles, and Paula laughs as she clarifies the matter, “Oh, this is someone else’s birthday party!” For the second time, we laugh at the apparent effort that went into cutting the cakes -- it appears the British birthday cakes were made of sterner stuff than their colonial counterparts: a sizable knife and considerable elbow grease was needed, judging from the onscreen labors!

    Funnier still is the intrusion of a bit of amateur pre-WW2 home theater: a relative offering his satiric impersonation of Adolf Hitler. “Clearly this is before the war,” Paula stammers. And then we’re on to another celebration -- Christmas: the decorated tree, wrapped gifts, unwrapped gifts (a doll), a bird (??) -- and the color 16mm reel came to its end at about 12:30.

    Without missing a beat, John Karol provided a timely and instantaneous historical context for much of Paula’s prior footage with a truncated five-minute b&w Gaumont British Newsreel -- Gaumont British News: Review of the Year 1937, in fact! The coronation of the King and Queen, and the Royal Family outing that followed; sports highlights, including the Grand Masters steeple chase, the British Open golfing championship, and boxing, tennis, racing, and the Yachtsman Cup competition. This is followed by news of the new 1937 records set with international flights, Amelia Earhart’s disappearance, the new air and land speed records, auto racing, all giving way to a procession of picturesque accidents and crashes (including at least two I recognized from their later use in the opening credits sequence of Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines) and -- suddenly the reel abruptly ended, terminated by an ancient tear in the original film! We clapped and cheered, so perfect was the timing amid the plethora of onscreen carnage.
    __

    During the short break, I met a few of the folks in the room, including Edward Kimball, a West Lebanon resident with an interesting background in film and art who is currently involved with the traveling gallery, The Yellow Trailer Art Gallery. He was on his way home for the day, though he’d enjoyed the event thus far; we exchanged contact info, and then the lights dimmed. “See you sometime,” Ed quietly said as Bruce proceeded into the first of Paula’s 8mm reels, circa 1958:

    Though the color wasn’t as saturated as that in Paula’s 16mm material, the camerawork was as steady as ever: I assumed (incorrectly) her father and mother were behind the camera for much of what followed, given the consistently high quality cinematography. The reel opened in Hyde Park in London: Paula was “newly married” -- and given the fact much of the footage covered Paula and her father and mother, it seems her new (American) husband was the cameraman for much of the ‘58 material! A steady hand, nonetheless, evidenced by the 8mm footage being screened. Ice cream is enjoyed all around onscreen. From London we’re off to Dartmouth, England, and various views of streets, old buildings, landmarks and the River Dart; Paula at and in the hotel they stayed at, outside the entryway, inside their room; Paula walking the stoney beach (“many of our beaches there haven’t any sand, you see,” see noted), and surprisingly sunny weather: “As you can see, the sun is shining,” Paula chipped in, “which is a plus.” As the shadows grow longer, indicating we are late in the day, we at last win a view of Paula’s American hubby: a hearty dark-haired fellow (she doesn’t mention his name, alas).

    The 1958 footage continues in Devon -- views of the Abbey, churches, shops, a sandy beach front and Paula pregnant, standing on a set of steps by the beach. Evidentally, time has passed! Ice cream all around again; pigs running in the road and various shots of the narrow Devon streets and roads; a boat, then a sign, Compton Castle: Up and Down the Dart,” and then gardens; a shorefront pavilion. Paula wearing teardrop sunglasses, standing by her husband; scenic views of rapids and the river, steady panoramic vistas of various locales (prompting Bruce to once again comment, “these are like animated postcards”). Paula and husband walk out on a wharf, as if to the edge of the timeframe -- because in a heartbeat, we are seeing their newborn child in the next shot, wearing a long white dress. “This was December of 1958,” Paula shares, noting the infant was born on an American military base in England: citizen of two nations?

    (I recall momentarily the opening shot of the afternoon, of toddler Paula teetering unsteadily on a British road: we've come a full generation already, in less than an hour. This is the miracle of home movies most folks brush off as being somehow mundane, unimportant, uninteresting. It's magic, pure magic.)

    Abundant baby shots follow: the infant with Paula, with her men: her husband, her father. The christening, another birthday -- “another one of these tough cakes,” Paula chuckles as we guffaw again at the apparent effort required to hack into the treat. Paula outdoors with her baby; the weather darker, drearier as the footage cuts to the east coast of England, “not far from Cambridge,” as Paula is shown walking her infant in a pram (babystroller) to the playground; “this is March of 1959,” we’re told, and then we’re seeing views of a coastal village. Low tide, boats beached, the water slightly iced over. “Ah, this is Elmhurst Park, in Woodbridge,” Paula chimes in, as we see her circa 1959 dressed in a long white coat with bright red shoes, a distinctively unhappy infant writhing in the pram; an extended view of Paula walking away from the camera up a walkway, as if for a final credits crawl; a shot of the proud grandfather, making playful boxing moves toward his somewhat gobsmacked-looking grandson -- and then, Paula’s 8mm reel ends, at 1:34 PM.

    Next up was another 8mm reel, this one a short 50-foot roll from the home movie collection of Irene Hollister, circa 1959 or 1960. These were initially Cape Cod shots, "taken on the Bay side," Irene mentions, including some rather beguiling interior shots from an interior window looking out, the light reflecting through a procession of colored glass bottles standing on the windowsill. “This is the Farmhouse,” Irene commented, “there was a book written about the Farmhouse,” a reference to a bit of Massachusetts and Cape Cod lore unknown to me. Overexposed shots of young Irene with Anne & Elliott Richardson, shots of a beach, “near the lighthouse” (another verbal reference to a Cape landmark unknown to me; I include it here for those who might know), and the short reel concludes with images of a picnic on the beach shot with greater intimacy than all that preceded it, ending with a closeup of a boy ravenously biting into a plum.

    Bruce quickly cued up Judith Kushner’s next extended 8mm family reel, which opened with crisp, crystal-clear black-and-white footage before her father’s splice cut to more color footage.

    With Judith’s permission, I will quote from her followup email to me, received this past week:

    “Footage included scenes from St. Paul, MN - probably about in 1947-48 when I was a toddler and my older sister, brother and neighborhood friends played under those shady, overarching elms; friendly old dog, brother sniffing the apple blossoms.”

    As an infant, Judith was wrapped in head-to-toe gear; her sister rides a bike under the elms. As the b&w footage gave way to color, Judith is suddenly a bit older: a toddler now, her brother David pushes a baby carriage, then rolling on the lawn by a sidewalk; Judith’s older sister playing “dress up” in a bridal gown and veil; the kids riding a tricycle, jumping rope. What followed covered almost two years of Judith and her family’s life, including (she said during the screening) shots from St. Paul, Minneapolis, & North Dakota, opening with (to again quote her email) “...scenes from Minnehaha Falls and a playground and my brother in a red beanie with a whirlygig on top; me wiggling out of our grandmother's (father's mother, born in Roumania) lap.” The shot of David and his beany drew a collective chuckle from the Home Movie Day audience, and lingered as a strangely moving iconic image from the day.

    Following were “Christmas scenes from that time, too, sister pleased with her muff, us kids putting up stockings -- that was the biggest Christmas ever in our family in terms of presents and I think it had something to do with our father returning from Japan, or Korea.” The fireplace mantle, the rituals of the stockings, the opening of gifts soon gave way to footage shot in the spring: the family at their door, bowing, the girls in their finest Easter dresses. David sniffing apple blossoms; the kids riding wagons on the sidewalk under the elms; a man pruning apple trees. End of Judith’s reel.

    But what next blazed across the screen was a world, a generation, and at least one rock-and-rolling counterculture-ravaged decade apart from the comfortable 1937-1960 home movies we’d enjoyed in the early afternoon.

    “We’ve got something really different to show you now, Bruce boisterously announced. Some of us had heard him chuckling over this material a bit earlier, while checking it at the editing station in the back of the room: apparently we were about to see something that had been presented or discovered via one of Bruce’s ongoing Dartmouth College screenings, “CineSalon.”

    We were about to see a 1970 amateur Dartmouth drive-in-wannabe opus entitled --

    Hard Rider!

    [Next: Home Movie Day Part the Fifth continues with its only exploitation biker/drug/party flick! Be here or be square!]
    _________

    A sobering thought for the coming election season: if you don’t care about anything else, at least vote to react to this by voting for candidates committed to addressing this dilemma:

    "Having raised the earth's temperature 1 degree Fahrenheit in the last three decades, we're facing another increase of 4 degrees over the next century. That would imply changes that constitute practically a different planet. It's not something we can adapt to. We can't let it go on another 10 years like this."

    - NASA's Goddard Space Institute Director James Hansen speaking to the Washington Post about how NASA's computer models are predicting the quick progression of global climate change.
    ___________

    See you tomorrow, or later in the week. The dirth of comments on the blog after the adundance of this week's posts is a bit discouraging, actually, and I've much to attend to in this prep week for CCS's upcoming new semester. So -- see you here, sometime this week.

    Have a great Labor Day Weekend, whatever the weather...
    ___________

    Saturday, September 02, 2006

    The Wicker Man Stings; Or, Gloria Swanson is the Bee's Knees Redux: The Wicker Man is a '70s remake, all right -- but not of just The Wicker Man...

    Right: What, out of wicker? The Bad (Bee) Seed
    'bad girl' poster art supplants the iconic Wicker Man

    Ah, the Hollywood cycle of 1970s horror movie remakes continues with yesterday's nationwide debut of The Wicker Man, which I attended, per my habit with these remakes, as (a) a matinee (less expensive and most of 'em have been best as matinee fodder) and (b) with absolutely zero expectations.

    Mind you, I'm a great fan of the original Anthony Shaffer/Robin Hardy feature The Wicker Man, and had the pleasure of seeing that twice in August, including turning my wife Marge onto it (she is no fan of horror films, but loved the Anchor Bay restoration of the 1973 The Wicker Man, which is indeed the best way to revisit it unless a big-screen revival is in driving distance of your home). I'm also a fan of the remake's writer/director Neil LaBute's films (my faves being In the Company of Men, Your Friends & Neighbors and Nurse Betty), so I had no predisposition against the remake in principle: seemed a fair chance it could be compelling in either context, so what the hell. I paid my bucks and took my seat.

    SPOILER WARNING: The rest of this review absolutely gives away everything about the remake, and I do mean everything. Hate to say so, but there's no other way to discuss it in short order. So, stop now if you've any intention of seeing the remake, then come back here and read on. Or don't. I don't care either way. Just don't want to ruin anything for you without fair notice. SPOILER WARNING concluded.

    Now, go see Anthony Shaffer and Robin Hardy's original 1973 The Wicker Man. Now. I'll wait. It's on DVD, and easy to find just now. No really, go see it, if you never have. It's essential viewing, and far, far more relevent to the contemporary right-wing religious patriarchal era of the Bush Administration than the remake.

    OK, seen it? Good. Alas, The Wicker Man has been ill-served by this remake. Now, try to forget the original version. Try.

    It's all reduced in the remake to lone male (Nicholas Cage) vs. malicious matriarchy (led by Ellen Burstyn, Regan's mama in The Exorcist, playing the Lord -- here Sister -- Summerisle role) on a remote Northwest Pacific island, where bee honey rather than apples are the core product. Of course, Cage's protagonist is deathly allergic to bee stings, though this is exploited and/or ignored at whim and is increasingly unbelievable. At one point (typical of how the film unravels as it unreels), Cage has his essential conversation with Sister Summerisle in her garden as bees flit and buzz all about (the dialogue herein is a patchwork pastiche of Shaffer's original exchange between Christopher Lee and Edward Woodward).

    Right: Cage to Burstyn: "How's Beezness?"

    As best I could tell, his mounting rage at her mere existence (though the plot mechanics would have us believe it's his concern for his missing daughter's welfare, it plays like he's just pissed at the arrogance of the matriarch) precluded his biological aversion to bees in short order. It was hard to tell, really, given the silliness of the preceding sequence in which Cage blundered like a bear through the beehive complex, suffering stings that should have killed the sonuvabitch deader than a doornail. If only this were a remake of My Girl...

    Stripped of the characterization of Shaffer's original, Cage is now a secular cop traumatized by a shattering encounter with a single mother and daughter on the highway (in a sequence much like the opener of Peter Medak's sleeper The Changeling). Surviving this accident, the guilt-wracked policeman is lured to Summerisle by Willow (Kate Beahan), the fiance who jilted him on the eve of their wedding. She's now begging for his help in the search for her missing daughter Rowan (Erica Shaye-Gair, the boogy-boogy waif of the remake's lame Omen-like poster art; emblematic of the stupidity of the studio behind this remake, they've chucked the film's evocative, now-iconic titular image) -- who, dig, turns out to be Cage's daughter, too (I warned you, I'm a spoiler in this review) to clumsily supplant the righteous patriarchal arrogance of the original's Edward Woodward protagonist with something to hang the remake's poorly-motivated revamp upon).

    What's lacking? While I miss the heart and soul of Shaffer & Hardy's film, the real problem is nothing takes its place in the remake save LaBute's ire at all womankind. Purists should note, just to get it out of the way, that there's no musical component here, save for the by-the-numbers score (among the most subversive delights of the original film is -- it's a musical!). Gone is the Christianity vs. druidic agrarian religion conflict, too, which renders the climactic paganistic ritual superfluous (it becomes, shorn of any recognizable historical context, as risible as the invented paganism of the Children of the Corn films).

    But the remake's problems are even more fundamental: there are no characterizations per se, save for the most rudimentary kind (which actually devolve as the film's gender-fueled polemic becomes more aggressive). Though lines are lifted verbatim from the original's sterling script, they fall flat: the villagers (women all, save for neutered male drones glimpsed later in the film) are from their first scene presented as unnaturally cruel in a bit of business involving a writhing, bleeding bag (containing -- what? We never find out). LaBute immediately plops an enigmatic mention of the wicker man into the proceedings (for no reason other than to set up the climax -- Shaffer and Hardy were clever enough to let the title alone beg the question resolved in the climax); the matter of the harvest photos in the pub is maladroitly fumbled, too.

    In the end, the wicker man itself isn't even reconceived to fit the hive metaphor (borrowing a page from the Clive Barker story "The Forbidden" that inspired Candyman would have worked wonders here), and the much-ballyhooed "shock ending" falls flat. Completely divorced from its Celtic druidic religious, historical and cultural context, and with nothing comparable to take its place, the plot is recontextualized into base drivel by supplanting the core premise to an increasingly numbing 'dread of women' horrorshow.

    (At one point, I found my mind wandering, considering what Roger Corman might have done to update the premise. Hmmmm, isolated agrarian cults in the 21st Century -- perhaps a melding of bubble-environment Disney World imperialist 'statehood' and covert Monsanto-like corporate GMF horrors would have filled the bill? Both corporate states in reality maintain their own laws and police forces, and escape outside-world scrutiny -- that would have been believable. A secretive commune of Mormon-like splinter-group extremists living by their own sexual and familial laws, helming an innovative ethynol-producing outpost in the heartland? But no, a hoary sf pastiche of New Age/Wiccan women must bear the brunt of this writer/director's outrage. Sigh.)

    Worst of all, the remake simply dissolves under the most cursory scrutiny. This is lazy storytelling, pure and simple, and the worst offenses include apparently supernatural sleight-of-hand that allows key characters to explosively die only to return, sans explanation, when it's convenient during the climax. This revionist occultism also extends to one of the few sympathetic female characters: in what is either a reflection of Cage's or LaBute's rabid fear of women, the question of how exactly Willow's unstamped letter landed into Cage's hands is resolved with a flashback to the lone female cop who visits Cage in apparent sympathy: a bee hovers and lands on her cheek, linking her improbably with the Summerisle coven (to what end? How? And if she isn't of the coven -- the image could be delusional in its context -- how did the letter reach its intended destination?). Thus (pardon my French), all women in this flick are betraying cunts to be feared/reviled, without exception.

    Another lazy form of supernaturalism pandemic in American action and horror pix allows Nic Cage to slap, punch, drop-kick and stomp "evil women" as "necessary," only for them to turn up later, unblemished by as much as a bruise (Sam Raimi typically channels this Tex Avery-like absurdism much better than LaBute, natch). The almost inhumanly lovely LeeLee Sobieski takes the worst abuse in a completely hamfisted sequence which serves neither narrative nor emotional logic (save, perhaps, to give repressed & roused male audiences of all ages seeking an outlet for their righteous anger another beating to cheer).



    Right: Actor Cage to Director LaBute:
    "OK, then do I kick the shit out of her?"

    Thus, the great clash-of-faiths central to the original is completely eschewed -- Cage's character has no religious beliefs, apparently (save for his fleeting attraction to self-help audio books), and in the end is reduced to howling "bitches!" instead of the original film's potent Christian-matyr speeches screamed by Edward Woodward from the wicker man pyre. Jettisoning the religious conflict -- which, again, would have been far more relevent and timely in the context of our current American landscape, and a far more courageous undertaking -- the core of Anthony Shaffer's potent original script is completely refuted in favor of blunt and often ludicrous backlash-against-feminism fear and loathing.

    It's a screed, really, disguised as a remake. To its coda (featuring cameo male-bait James Franco and Jason Ritter), the remake simply projects a pathological dread of predatory females. I hasten to add there's no real sexual component, either, beyond the fear-of-woman and males-as-drones (another sad disposal of a key component of the original). In concept and execution, this PG-13 opus plays like a 1970s TV movie -- which, BTW, The Wicker Man remake most resembles.

    It especially resembles one in particular, in fact: Curtis Harrington's made-for-TV gem Killer Bees (first broadcast on Feb. 26, 1974; scripted by the husband and wife team of John William Corrington & Joyce Corrington), which starred Gloria Swanson as the matriarch of a venerable California vineyard's hive-like colony which needs a new queen (Kate Jackson). The parallels are uncanny, though Harrington's movie-of-the-week is the superior film in every way, however impoverished its budget.

    Bee Girls By Any Other Name

    In other ways, too, LaBute's The Wicker Man remake reminded me at times of Denis Sanders/Nicholas Meyer/Sylvia Schneble's drive-in opus Invasion of the Bee Girls (aka Graveyard Tramps, 1973) -- but, like, not as funny, or as much fun, or as self-aware of its most ludicrous elements. LaBute in fact lifts a couple of his revisionist 'shock' shots verbatim from both these 1970s films (including a shot of a bee-covered vixen leering in a chamber in Summerisle's abode), sans either's context, rendering them nonsensical in the remake's shaky revamp of the original's premise. (The old Outer Limits 'queen bee' episode "Zzzzz" -- January 27, 1964 -- also comes to mind.)

    Left: Come to the Bosom of the Beehive: Queen Swanso -- uh, Sister Burstyn

    Thus, LaBute's remake of The Wicker Man joins Snakes on a Plane as the second notable genre TV movie remake of the year; Snakes on a Plane, natch, was essentially a remake of the entire 1970s reptiles/insects/arachnids in/on a plane/boat/submarine/housing development/town etc. cycle (see Fer-De-Lance, Tarantulas: The Deadly Cargo, etc.), and I had a lot more fun with Snakes than I had with Wicker Man.

    It's worth noting, however, the fear-of-feminism that was so prevalent in so many '70s TV movies was of its era. One wonders what its revival in this remake mirrors of the contemporary 2006 landscape with such lazy candor.

    Curious to note, in that context, that both the key TV movies fueling dread-of-women (primarily genre fare, from the Richard Matheson-scripted The Stranger Within to the brilliant Legend of Lizzie Borden) and LaBute's Wicker Man surface during the reign of two of our most condescendingly patriarchal Presidents (Nixon and Bush, respectively), and at the height of conservative and Republican dominance in key seats of power (though Nixon at least had some elected Democratic checks and balances to contend with, unlike Bush today). What primal patriarchal dread is manifesting itself in these pop culture eruptions?

    Rationally, I've had my fill of patriarchs, padrone; if you're trying to scare me with this kind of blood-and-thunder nonsense, reality has outstripped you, Neil. I'll take the beehive.

    Curious, too, that LaBute's The Wicker Man hits theaters the very week that an extremist religious cult patriarch (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints leader Warren Steed Jeffs) is in the headlines as one of the FBI's "Most Wanted" finally captured in Las Vegas. In another indication of how wrong-headed LaBute's amazonian beehive fantasy really is, reports have also emerged of 400 to 1000 displaced homeless teenage boys in Utah communities, ejected from their homes by Jeffs and his followers who found their sons dangerous competition for preteen and teen young women (read: eligible brides). You don't need queen bee matriarchs to sire disposable drones when you've got active polygamist patriarchs working the numbers to arrive at the same conclusion -- indicating, perhaps, a far more fruitful (pun intended) direction LaBute could have taken with his remake, had he been able to yank his head out of his misogynistic ass long enough.

    Gasp! Matriarchs! Frances Conroy (right) and coven.

    Now, I'm not arguing The Wicker Man would have been inherently better had it been a feminist rather than an anti-feminist screed: the dilemma here is that The Wicker Man botches its own premise, as well as that of the original classic it presents itself as remaking. It serves neither.

    Nor am I ideologically opposed to a patriarchal attack on matriarchies per se: I don't subscribe to either gender orientation (people are people in my book), but if you're going to take your swings, at least do so with the integrity, chops and intensity of a Don Siegel, Lars Von Trier, Vincente Aranda or Sam Peckinpah in their prime, or don't waste my time. La Novia Ensangrentada/The Blood-Spattered Bride (1972), The Beguiled and Straw Dogs (both 1971) -- to mention three random examples -- can be and have been justifiably intepreted as misogynist polemics and screeds, but they have the courage of their convictions and tell their stories with unflinching ferocity, clarity and intelligence (they were also products of their era, as much as the TV movies I referred to above). I needn't share their philosophical underpinnings to savor their stories or the skill with which they are realized, any more than I must loathe my own gender to enjoy feminist films: whatever their politics, if a film (or book or comic or piece of music or art) engages me, I am attentive. I relish the skills of many artists, whatever their gender politics, if their work compells me -- including many anti-male screeds (like Niki de St. Phalle & Peter Whitehead's Daddy, 1973, etc.) that delivered in spades as works of art and/or entertainment, refined or primal, polished or primitive.

    I'm sorry to say that LaBute's remake of The Wicker Man is just a lame story badly told, reducing its gender polemic to easily shrugged-off claptrap.

    There are some elements to savor herein, primary among them the fine cast and crisp cinematography. Frances Conroy (of Six Feet Under) delivers the film's slyest performance and steals the show, and Sobrieski's ethereal radiance cannot be undone even by Cage drop-kicking her full-force into a wall. Kate Beahan does what she can with the thankless role of ultimate betrayer Sister Willow, and there's some eerie and evocative use of twins throughout, both children and elder (a blind pair of 'seers' evocative, along with Rowan's red garb, of Nicolas Roeg's infinitely better Don't Look Now, itself a companion piece -- in its production history -- with the original Wicker Man), though to no real point.

    Like others of his ilk (reputable indy directors with proven non-genre track records), LaBute seems to approach his dallying in the genre as an excuse for slumming. He instantly debases the very source material he claims/reclaims -- Shaffer's original script -- while never once approaching the intelligence and skill of the wellspring he is sullying. Sigh. It's a sad spectacle, beginning to end, save for the bright spots Conroy and others provide.

    I must note that the end credits crawl for this remake acknowledges as a source not only Shaffer's screenplay, but the novel Ritual by David Piner (1967, Hutchinson, UK), a curious bit of legal redressing that hopefully will result in Piner's novel being reprinted somewhere, somehow.

    Piner's novel has long been rumored to be the 'secret inspiration' for Shaffer's screenplay, and those wishing to find out more are heartily urged to nab a copy of
  • the book Creeping Flesh: The Horror Fantasy Film Book Vol. 1 edited by David Kerekes.
  • Contributor Gary Ramsay offers the definitive assessment of the controversy and comparison's of Piner's rare novel to the beloved film's script (see pp. 97-100); recommended reading (as is the entire book, and the second volume, too)!

    The 2006 The Wicker Man remake joins the recent The Stepford Wives remake as a botched "update" pretending to engage with gender politics. Crash-and-burn LaBute admittedly has more balls than Frank Oz in the primal rage department, but proves just as sloppy a storyteller (curiously, LaBute's Wicker Man is almost a perfect inversion of the original Bryan Forbes/Ira Levin Stepford Wives, with testosterone ire; would LaBute -- and the audience -- been better served by a LaBute remake of Wives?).

    As the original The Wicker Man amply dramatized, you don't turn an angry fundamentalist loose on Summerisle without the bull-in-the-orchard (or beehive) chasing his tail to his own fiery demise.

    (c)Stephen R. Bissette; images (c) the respective proprietors.

    Ah, jeez, more blogging woes... again, I've posted (or tried to post) already this morn, and hopefully it'll be up soon.

    It's All for Rock'n'Roll!

    Update on the Brattleboro Scene: Here's
  • yesterday's news story I referred to from The Brattleboro Reformer;
  • and here's
  • today's Reformer followup.
  • In short, The Dr. Phil Show indeed showed last night, but the teen protestors were ready for 'em. What were they protesting? It's unclear as ever ("We're so jaded by this media coverage that we've forgotten about what we were making a statement" -- nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!), but it's "all for rock'n'roll" now, bunky! Jeremiah Crompton and Alec McPherson insisted on being filmed only in the buff when with their guitars, refused any of the program's planned staged nudity (in front of one of Brat's churches; in front of shocked old ladies, etc.), and now it's all about their band, Corpsicle Rok City. Media-savvy youth, the world is your oyster.

    For the record: HomeyM notes, via email, "Steve Steidle comes out for nudity?", citing this item from Reformer reporter Howard Weiss-Tisman's earlier coverage of the August 18th incident and its repercussions: "Word that the Selectboard was going to take up the issue caused a small group of young men and women to throw off their clothes in protest two weeks ago today.

    "This is something the town needs to look at," Selectboard Chairman Stephen Steidle said."


    Also for the record: Alec and his twin brother Ian collaborated with their peers on a short feature film earlier this year, Delusion, while completing their Senior year at Brattleboro Union High School and studies with the Center for Digital Art in Brat. Ian was the primary creative force on Delusion -- he wrote and directed -- a distinctively Brian DePalma-esque thriller consciously spiced with touches of Roman Polanski and Nicolas Roeg, and a pretty polished piece of work for a student debut feature it was, too.

    More on Delusion and the CDA in future installments...

    Friday, September 01, 2006

    No idea when the blog will accept today's post... sigh. It's been spinning and sputtering all morning -- as soon as it's working properly, I'll have it up!

    On the nature of Civil Disobedience, The Hypocrisies of Nudes, Dudes, Prudes and War...

    A curious conjunction of events prompts this morning's opening volley: in short:

    * (a) a group of teenagers who staged a completely peacable public protest two weeks ago in nearby Brattleboro by sitting in the local business district parking lot, the aptly-named Harmony Lot, in the nude, prompting little immediate consequence (there's no public ordinance against nudity per se, and the students were uniformly -- pun intended -- perfectly well behaved);

    * (b) the unexpected international ripples and national news attention to the above event, culminating in pending TV coverage and even a visit to Brattleboro (hereafter "Brat") from none other than Dr. Phil;

    * (c) a New York Times editorial asking, "where's the protest movement?";

    * (d) the arrival yesterday via UPS of Top Shelf's utterly exquisite publication of the complete, three-volume slipcased Alan Moore/Melinda Gebbie erotic comic classic Lost Girls;

    * (e) a home screening of the stunning Vietnam War documentary Winter Soldier, and;

    * (f) this week's aggressive election-season rollout of pro-Iraq War speeches (and very ominous deja vu overtures to war with Iran) from Donald Rumsfeld and President George W. Bush, before targeted and "friendly" tried-and-true American Legion audiences, overtly linking WW2 with their neocon agenda and the rise of fascism with any criticism of said neocon agenda and the Iraq War.

    Which is the "obscenity" worthy of media ire and attention?

    Well, it looks like it's teen nudity in Brat, folks. Never mind that just a week ago in his staggering performance before the nation during his Monday press conference Bush unabashedly denied ever having linked 9/11 and the Iraq War -- in less than a month, he and his cronies are doing so again with more manic energy than they've given to the task in almost a year.

    Meanwhile, the trial of the Marine(s) accused of the precalculated rape and murder of a teenage Iraqi girl and her family is going down, almost invisible from the public at large. The ongoing assertions that these kinds of atrocities -- from Abu Ghraib to Pfc. John J. Jodka III and his six fellow marines and one Navy corpsman rape & murder of Hashim Ibrahim Awad and execution of her family -- are aberrations is difficult to sustain. As the Vietnam veterans's "Winter Soldier" February 1971 testimonials (documented in harrowing detail in the film
  • Winter Soldier, which I most heartily recommend)
  • demonstrated then, and the mounting evidence and patterns emerging from the current Iraq War show, sanctioned and institutionalized xenophobia, racism, demonization and dehumanization of 'the Other' as a targetted 'enemy' inevitably breeds institutionalized sadism, brutality, torture and murder.



    It is sickening, the ongoing spectacle of Bush and his cabinet trying to maintain complete deniability, while arrogantly stumping for their fucking war(s). But, hey, what do I know? According to Rummy, I'm clearly a Nazi sympathizer.

    "Ears for beers," as one of the Winter Soldier testimonies so bluntly put it, referring to the practice of cutting off body parts to prove inflated enemy body counts: soldiers returning with ears, heads, etc. were rewarded, while units not yielding the needed body counts were penalized (as one Winter Soldier's choked testimony asserted, relating how his battalion was punitively starved by their superiors for failing to deliver the goods). Ears for beers.

    Ears for beers indeed -- American Legion vets applauded Nixon, too, at that time. Their President talks, and they listen. Drink up, Legionnaires! Applaud as Bush and Rumsfeld spill their hateful, fear-baiting poison and create tens of thousands of new vets, shorn of limbs, organs, eyes, faces, having sacrificed all they can afford to this war that has nothing to do with 9/11, by our President's own blunt admission a mere week-and-a-half ago.

    There are
  • many sites (here's one) perpetuating the Nixon Administration's smear tactics against the Winter Soldiers,
  • and
  • here's another, just to spare nay-sayers the posting,
  • but intensive followup demonstrates that the nay-sayers have been unable to discredit the testimonies, and in fact
  • "To date, no records of fraudulent participants or fraudulent testimony have been produced."
  • Among the buried news stories of the summer was the quiet release of previously-sealed US military documents
  • which have included documentation of US military investigations of all the Winter Soldiers' testimonials, and verification of them, which of course the military did not acknowledge -- even to the vets who testified,
  • as reported in
  • The Los Angeles Times,

  • The Nation,

  • and arguably building upon these Pulitzer-Prize winning 2004 articles in the Toledo Blade.
  • But is anyone drawing the correlations between the past and present on the most prominent national media stages? Of course not. There is no connect-the-dots between Bush & Rummy's reinvigorated campaign of terror this week and the trial of Pfc. John J. Jodka III, save for Rumsfeld's shameful preemptive strike against any who question the neocon warmongering agenda.

    So, where is the randy restless eye of international media attention turning?

    Well, ten miles from my home.

    Right on the heels of the defiled corpse of the Jon Benet Ramsey foofarah being raised and hastily dropped, the warmer bodies of still-living teen flesh have caught the media eye. Thus far, though, there's little apparent regard to why and what the protest was about -- just the issue of public nudity.

    Typical American puritan bullshit, in short.

    Ignore the man in front of the curtain, spouting more fascistic rhetoric about war and fascism: what is it with these nude kids in Blue-State Vermont??

    I'll spare you the spin, which is everywhere and readily available online, and send you immediately to
  • the source article in the August 19th Brattleboro Reformer,
  • noting too that the teens involved are well known in town and great folks.

    Since then, Theresa Toney has taken it upon her outraged self to complain to the town selectboard and demand the town do something to clothe the youths and outlaw such displays, and the letters have been coming fast and furious to the town newspaper.

    No surprises, there -- but invites from Morton Downey Jr.-like Fox News mad dog Bill O'Reilly to the Brattleboro Chief of Police John Martin, Dr. Phil to Theresa Toney, and the news hitting the globe from The London Times, BBC etc. to New Zealand? Astounding. And (though I could be wrong) I'm not seeing any attempt to cover the protestors point of view. Why talk to kids?

    The most rational local response, which I hope is mirrored internationally (though I doubt it), was forwarded to me by HomeyM, via an LOC authored by "Linaelin" on Saturday, August 26 2006 @ 04:26 PM EDT:

    "Freedom, or Insanity?

    What really has sparked the debate has been the nude actions of the young men and women downtown. To them the adult world seems insane especially right now. What did one say, "We have a nuclear power plant a few miles away and a ridiculous war in the Middle East, countries getting bombed. So why's it such a big problem if we chose to get nude?"

    They are making a good point in a non-violent way. They could have decided to spray paint buildings and cars, or get drunk and throw up in someone's mailbox. But they chose not to frighten people, especially the children. And Miss Toney, rather than turn off her attention to the matter, seems more to have been turned on by her attention to the matter. Shame on her! Think of the children."


    Would that they were so focused -- "Freak power!" is the operative phrase in all this, I think, that freak power as random and unfocused as it often was in the late '60s and early '70s, per my own high school experience -- still, this form of civil disobedience is harmless, a tempest in a teapot, and is likely to become more common as global warming inevitably asserts itself.

    We are indeed a nation at war, under the reign of a President who assumed power via two still-disputed elections, and there is indeed Yankee Nuclear mere minutes from downtown Brattleboro, one of our country's oldest plants that was supposed to be off-line by now but is instead up and running at 24% increased capacity, the radioactive flower in Entergy's corporate crown. So, fuck it, I can't blame these kids: why not take off your clothes and stage a protest? The country, their state, the town is going to hell in a handbasket. It's as sane a reaction as any to the insanity of the world they've inherited.

    Once again nudity -- sex, in the eyes of many, though there was nothing sexualized about the sit-in -- not war, is the hot-button issue staunch conservatives are quickest to get riled about, as demonstrated by last election season's relentless exploitation of gay rights and abortion to divert attention from the debased and debilitating Republican rape of our own economy and reckless warmongering. "Reckless" nudity is more infuriating than reckless war -- are we still such prudish idiots?

    We are.
    ___

    So into this environment comes at last the calculated art bomb of Alan Moore & Melinda Gebbie's Lost Girls, which -- given its intensive exploration of sexuality, in fantasy and in the flesh -- was most likely the most single provocative series to have emerged from Taboo, which is saying something, if I may say so myself.


    Launched in 1991 in the pages of my own 1990s horror anthology experiment Taboo (running in serialized form from volumes 5 thru 7, Lost Girls's initial serialization terminating as Tundra and SpiderBaby Grafix severed relations and ended the initial run of the anthology). It debuted in one of our most sexually explicit volumes -- featuring stories like S. Clay Wilson's gay coprophilia opus "This is Dynamite!", Michael Zulli's horrific adaptation of Ramsey Campbell's shocking short story "Again", Tom Marnick/Foxmarnick & Denis Ellefson's chilling meditation on the Black Dahlia murder "39th & Norton" (with a lively intro by none other than James Ellroy), and Matt Howarth's genuinely disturbing "Baby's on Fire", among others -- which was fitting: Lost Girls was Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie's grand erotic graphic novel, and Taboo's one and only color series. Melinda's warm palette and abundance of variations on flesh tonalities lent a rich patina to the entirity of the rest of Taboo run, breathing life and fecundity into the whole via its radiant glow.

    The decision to showcase their epic erotic effort in the context of Taboo was a calculated decision, and utterly appropriate: now having read the completed novel, 15 years later, I've no doubt had Lost Girls completed its run in Taboo, it would have been our single most controversial component, most likely prompting more legal action than anything in Taboo brief lifetime ever did.



    Lost Girls's heartfelt exploration of all facets of human sexuality emerges from its immediately provocative location of that quest in the meeting of a trio of female fantasy literature icons: Alice, Wendy and Dorothy, now adults and far in time from their respective Wonderland, Neverland and Land of Oz, but never far from them, really, in their most intimate memories and fantasies, "the realms of our sexual awakening and fulfillment," as Top Shelf's descriptive promo text puts it. As the ominous clouds of pending war (what will become World War I, a choice more relevent to our 21st Century reality than even Alan could have calculated 15 years ago) converge just outside the comfortable retreat of a luxury Austrian hotel, Alice, Wendy & Dorothy share their deepest secrets and fondest and most feared fantasies, and the clash between Western notions and dread of sexuality vs. Western fantasies and fomenting of war seethes beneath the whole, culminating in one of the most potent concluding pages to any graphic work I have ever experienced.

    Where is the obscenity? In the abundance of richly-colored orifices and protrusions, cocks and cunts, tongues and semen, or in the glistening finality of a fatal wound, the finality of death and inevitable consequence of war? Alan & Melinda make explicit the obscenity of this hypocrisy, the villification of sex vs. the glorification of war, with Lost Girl's heartrending final page.
    _______

    Check it out yourself, in any case. Working in concert with Alan & Melinda, Top Shelf publisher Chris Staros has done an impeccable job of showcasing this masterpiece: Lost Girls is packaged as three 112-page ovesized hardcover volumes in a gorgeous slipcase, and the color reproduction throughout is simply staggering.

    [BTW, here's where to find both:
  • the pair of Taboo 5 and the complete Top Shelf Lost Girls slipcase edition are both available here from PaneltoPanel.net,
  • or you can purchase Taboo 5 directly from me (feel free to email me at msbissette@yahoo.com), and I'll reply.]
    ________

    Tomorrow, back to the relative comfort of Home Movie Day: Part the Fourth, then more on Lost Girls, and the Taboo connection...